CVE-2006-2656 (GCVE-0-2006-2656)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2006-05-30 22:00 – Updated: 2024-08-07 17:58
VLAI?
Summary
Stack-based buffer overflow in the tiffsplit command in libtiff 3.8.2 and earlier might might allow attackers to execute arbitrary code via a long filename. NOTE: tiffsplit is not setuid. If there is not a common scenario under which tiffsplit is called with attacker-controlled command line arguments, then perhaps this issue should not be included in CVE.
Severity ?
No CVSS data available.
CWE
- n/a
Assigner
References
| URL | Tags | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2024-08-07T17:58:51.709Z",
"orgId": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"shortName": "CVE"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "FEDORA-2006-591",
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_FEDORA",
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-package-announce/2006-May/msg00127.html"
},
{
"name": "20520",
"tags": [
"third-party-advisory",
"x_refsource_SECUNIA",
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/20520"
},
{
"name": "20766",
"tags": [
"third-party-advisory",
"x_refsource_SECUNIA",
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/20766"
},
{
"name": "GLSA-200607-03",
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_GENTOO",
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "http://security.gentoo.org/glsa/glsa-200607-03.xml"
},
{
"name": "20501",
"tags": [
"third-party-advisory",
"x_refsource_SECUNIA",
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/20501"
},
{
"name": "DSA-1091",
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_DEBIAN",
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "http://www.debian.org/security/2006/dsa-1091"
},
{
"name": "SUSE-SR:2006:014",
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_SUSE",
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "http://lists.suse.com/archive/suse-security-announce/2006-Jun/0008.html"
},
{
"name": "MDKSA-2006:095",
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_MANDRIVA",
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "http://www.mandriva.com/security/advisories?name=MDKSA-2006:095"
},
{
"name": "21002",
"tags": [
"third-party-advisory",
"x_refsource_SECUNIA",
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/21002"
},
{
"name": "20060524 tiffsplit (libtiff \u003c= 3.8.2) bss \u0026 stack buffer overflow...",
"tags": [
"mailing-list",
"x_refsource_VULN-DEV",
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "http://marc.info/?l=vuln-dev\u0026m=114857412916909\u0026w=2"
},
{
"name": "USN-289-1",
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_UBUNTU",
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://usn.ubuntu.com/289-1/"
}
],
"title": "CVE Program Container"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"product": "n/a",
"vendor": "n/a",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "n/a"
}
]
}
],
"datePublic": "2006-05-24T04:00:00.000Z",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "Stack-based buffer overflow in the tiffsplit command in libtiff 3.8.2 and earlier might might allow attackers to execute arbitrary code via a long filename. NOTE: tiffsplit is not setuid. If there is not a common scenario under which tiffsplit is called with attacker-controlled command line arguments, then perhaps this issue should not be included in CVE."
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"description": "n/a",
"lang": "en",
"type": "text"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2018-10-04T00:57:01.000Z",
"orgId": "53f830b8-0a3f-465b-8143-3b8a9948e749",
"shortName": "redhat"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "FEDORA-2006-591",
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_FEDORA"
],
"url": "https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-package-announce/2006-May/msg00127.html"
},
{
"name": "20520",
"tags": [
"third-party-advisory",
"x_refsource_SECUNIA"
],
"url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/20520"
},
{
"name": "20766",
"tags": [
"third-party-advisory",
"x_refsource_SECUNIA"
],
"url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/20766"
},
{
"name": "GLSA-200607-03",
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_GENTOO"
],
"url": "http://security.gentoo.org/glsa/glsa-200607-03.xml"
},
{
"name": "20501",
"tags": [
"third-party-advisory",
"x_refsource_SECUNIA"
],
"url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/20501"
},
{
"name": "DSA-1091",
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_DEBIAN"
],
"url": "http://www.debian.org/security/2006/dsa-1091"
},
{
"name": "SUSE-SR:2006:014",
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_SUSE"
],
"url": "http://lists.suse.com/archive/suse-security-announce/2006-Jun/0008.html"
},
{
"name": "MDKSA-2006:095",
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_MANDRIVA"
],
"url": "http://www.mandriva.com/security/advisories?name=MDKSA-2006:095"
},
{
"name": "21002",
"tags": [
"third-party-advisory",
"x_refsource_SECUNIA"
],
"url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/21002"
},
{
"name": "20060524 tiffsplit (libtiff \u003c= 3.8.2) bss \u0026 stack buffer overflow...",
"tags": [
"mailing-list",
"x_refsource_VULN-DEV"
],
"url": "http://marc.info/?l=vuln-dev\u0026m=114857412916909\u0026w=2"
},
{
"name": "USN-289-1",
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_UBUNTU"
],
"url": "https://usn.ubuntu.com/289-1/"
}
]
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "53f830b8-0a3f-465b-8143-3b8a9948e749",
"assignerShortName": "redhat",
"cveId": "CVE-2006-2656",
"datePublished": "2006-05-30T22:00:00.000Z",
"dateReserved": "2006-05-30T04:00:00.000Z",
"dateUpdated": "2024-08-07T17:58:51.709Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.1"
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…