CVE-2020-15128 (GCVE-0-2020-15128)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2020-07-31 17:45 – Updated: 2024-08-04 13:08
VLAI?
Title
Reliance on Cookies without validation in OctoberCMS
Summary
In OctoberCMS before version 1.0.468, encrypted cookie values were not tied to the name of the cookie the value belonged to. This meant that certain classes of attacks that took advantage of other theoretical vulnerabilities in user facing code (nothing exploitable in the core project itself) had a higher chance of succeeding. Specifically, if your usage exposed a way for users to provide unfiltered user input and have it returned to them as an encrypted cookie (ex. storing a user provided search query in a cookie) they could then use the generated cookie in place of other more tightly controlled cookies; or if your usage exposed the plaintext version of an encrypted cookie at any point to the user they could theoretically provide encrypted content from your application back to it as an encrypted cookie and force the framework to decrypt it for them. Issue has been fixed in build 468 (v1.0.468).
Severity ?
6.1 (Medium)
CWE
- CWE-565 - {"CWE-565":"Reliance on Cookies without Validation and Integrity Checking"}
Assigner
References
| URL | Tags | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|||||||||||
Impacted products
| Vendor | Product | Version | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| octobercms | october |
Affected:
< 1.0.468
|
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2024-08-04T13:08:22.316Z",
"orgId": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"shortName": "CVE"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"x_refsource_CONFIRM",
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://github.com/octobercms/october/security/advisories/GHSA-55mm-5399-7r63"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC",
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://github.com/octobercms/library/pull/508"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC",
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://github.com/octobercms/library/commit/28310d4fb336a1741b39498f4474497644a6875c"
}
],
"title": "CVE Program Container"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"product": "october",
"vendor": "octobercms",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "\u003c 1.0.468"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "In OctoberCMS before version 1.0.468, encrypted cookie values were not tied to the name of the cookie the value belonged to. This meant that certain classes of attacks that took advantage of other theoretical vulnerabilities in user facing code (nothing exploitable in the core project itself) had a higher chance of succeeding. Specifically, if your usage exposed a way for users to provide unfiltered user input and have it returned to them as an encrypted cookie (ex. storing a user provided search query in a cookie) they could then use the generated cookie in place of other more tightly controlled cookies; or if your usage exposed the plaintext version of an encrypted cookie at any point to the user they could theoretically provide encrypted content from your application back to it as an encrypted cookie and force the framework to decrypt it for them. Issue has been fixed in build 468 (v1.0.468)."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "HIGH",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "NONE",
"baseScore": 6.1,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"integrityImpact": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "CHANGED",
"userInteraction": "REQUIRED",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:N/I:H/A:N",
"version": "3.1"
}
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-565",
"description": "{\"CWE-565\":\"Reliance on Cookies without Validation and Integrity Checking\"}",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2020-07-31T17:45:20.000Z",
"orgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"shortName": "GitHub_M"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"x_refsource_CONFIRM"
],
"url": "https://github.com/octobercms/october/security/advisories/GHSA-55mm-5399-7r63"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://github.com/octobercms/library/pull/508"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://github.com/octobercms/library/commit/28310d4fb336a1741b39498f4474497644a6875c"
}
],
"source": {
"advisory": "GHSA-55mm-5399-7r63",
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"title": "Reliance on Cookies without validation in OctoberCMS",
"x_legacyV4Record": {
"CVE_data_meta": {
"ASSIGNER": "security-advisories@github.com",
"ID": "CVE-2020-15128",
"STATE": "PUBLIC",
"TITLE": "Reliance on Cookies without validation in OctoberCMS"
},
"affects": {
"vendor": {
"vendor_data": [
{
"product": {
"product_data": [
{
"product_name": "october",
"version": {
"version_data": [
{
"version_value": "\u003c 1.0.468"
}
]
}
}
]
},
"vendor_name": "octobercms"
}
]
}
},
"data_format": "MITRE",
"data_type": "CVE",
"data_version": "4.0",
"description": {
"description_data": [
{
"lang": "eng",
"value": "In OctoberCMS before version 1.0.468, encrypted cookie values were not tied to the name of the cookie the value belonged to. This meant that certain classes of attacks that took advantage of other theoretical vulnerabilities in user facing code (nothing exploitable in the core project itself) had a higher chance of succeeding. Specifically, if your usage exposed a way for users to provide unfiltered user input and have it returned to them as an encrypted cookie (ex. storing a user provided search query in a cookie) they could then use the generated cookie in place of other more tightly controlled cookies; or if your usage exposed the plaintext version of an encrypted cookie at any point to the user they could theoretically provide encrypted content from your application back to it as an encrypted cookie and force the framework to decrypt it for them. Issue has been fixed in build 468 (v1.0.468)."
}
]
},
"impact": {
"cvss": {
"attackComplexity": "HIGH",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "NONE",
"baseScore": 6.1,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"integrityImpact": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "CHANGED",
"userInteraction": "REQUIRED",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:N/I:H/A:N",
"version": "3.1"
}
},
"problemtype": {
"problemtype_data": [
{
"description": [
{
"lang": "eng",
"value": "{\"CWE-565\":\"Reliance on Cookies without Validation and Integrity Checking\"}"
}
]
}
]
},
"references": {
"reference_data": [
{
"name": "https://github.com/octobercms/october/security/advisories/GHSA-55mm-5399-7r63",
"refsource": "CONFIRM",
"url": "https://github.com/octobercms/october/security/advisories/GHSA-55mm-5399-7r63"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/octobercms/library/pull/508",
"refsource": "MISC",
"url": "https://github.com/octobercms/library/pull/508"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/octobercms/library/commit/28310d4fb336a1741b39498f4474497644a6875c",
"refsource": "MISC",
"url": "https://github.com/octobercms/library/commit/28310d4fb336a1741b39498f4474497644a6875c"
}
]
},
"source": {
"advisory": "GHSA-55mm-5399-7r63",
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
}
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"assignerShortName": "GitHub_M",
"cveId": "CVE-2020-15128",
"datePublished": "2020-07-31T17:45:20.000Z",
"dateReserved": "2020-06-25T00:00:00.000Z",
"dateUpdated": "2024-08-04T13:08:22.316Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.1"
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…