CVE-2020-16244 (GCVE-0-2020-16244)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2020-09-23 13:03 – Updated: 2024-08-04 13:37
VLAI?
Summary
GE Digital APM Classic, Versions 4.4 and prior. Salt is not used for hash calculation of passwords, making it possible to decrypt passwords. This design flaw, along with the IDOR vulnerability, puts the entire platform at high risk because an authenticated user can retrieve all user account data and then retrieve the actual passwords.
Severity ?
No CVSS data available.
CWE
- CWE-759 - USE OF A ONE-WAY HASH WITHOUT A SALT CWE-759
Assigner
References
| URL | Tags | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|||||
Impacted products
| Vendor | Product | Version | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| n/a | GE Digital APM Classic |
Affected:
Versions 4.4 and prior
|
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2024-08-04T13:37:53.990Z",
"orgId": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"shortName": "CVE"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC",
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://us-cert.cisa.gov/ics/advisories/icsa-20-266-01"
}
],
"title": "CVE Program Container"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"product": "GE Digital APM Classic",
"vendor": "n/a",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "Versions 4.4 and prior"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "GE Digital APM Classic, Versions 4.4 and prior. Salt is not used for hash calculation of passwords, making it possible to decrypt passwords. This design flaw, along with the IDOR vulnerability, puts the entire platform at high risk because an authenticated user can retrieve all user account data and then retrieve the actual passwords."
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-759",
"description": "USE OF A ONE-WAY HASH WITHOUT A SALT CWE-759",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2020-09-23T13:03:05.000Z",
"orgId": "7d14cffa-0d7d-4270-9dc0-52cabd5a23a6",
"shortName": "icscert"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://us-cert.cisa.gov/ics/advisories/icsa-20-266-01"
}
],
"x_legacyV4Record": {
"CVE_data_meta": {
"ASSIGNER": "ics-cert@hq.dhs.gov",
"ID": "CVE-2020-16244",
"STATE": "PUBLIC"
},
"affects": {
"vendor": {
"vendor_data": [
{
"product": {
"product_data": [
{
"product_name": "GE Digital APM Classic",
"version": {
"version_data": [
{
"version_value": "Versions 4.4 and prior"
}
]
}
}
]
},
"vendor_name": "n/a"
}
]
}
},
"data_format": "MITRE",
"data_type": "CVE",
"data_version": "4.0",
"description": {
"description_data": [
{
"lang": "eng",
"value": "GE Digital APM Classic, Versions 4.4 and prior. Salt is not used for hash calculation of passwords, making it possible to decrypt passwords. This design flaw, along with the IDOR vulnerability, puts the entire platform at high risk because an authenticated user can retrieve all user account data and then retrieve the actual passwords."
}
]
},
"problemtype": {
"problemtype_data": [
{
"description": [
{
"lang": "eng",
"value": "USE OF A ONE-WAY HASH WITHOUT A SALT CWE-759"
}
]
}
]
},
"references": {
"reference_data": [
{
"name": "https://us-cert.cisa.gov/ics/advisories/icsa-20-266-01",
"refsource": "MISC",
"url": "https://us-cert.cisa.gov/ics/advisories/icsa-20-266-01"
}
]
}
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "7d14cffa-0d7d-4270-9dc0-52cabd5a23a6",
"assignerShortName": "icscert",
"cveId": "CVE-2020-16244",
"datePublished": "2020-09-23T13:03:05.000Z",
"dateReserved": "2020-07-31T00:00:00.000Z",
"dateUpdated": "2024-08-04T13:37:53.990Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.1"
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…