alsa-2025:23744
Vulnerability from osv_almalinux
Published
2025-12-22 00:00
Modified
2025-12-22 12:38
Summary
Important: git-lfs security update
Details
Git Large File Storage (LFS) replaces large files such as audio samples, videos, datasets, and graphics with text pointers inside Git, while storing the file contents on a remote server.
Security Fix(es):
- git-lfs: Git LFS may write to arbitrary files via crafted symlinks (CVE-2025-26625)
For more details about the security issue(s), including the impact, a CVSS score, acknowledgments, and other related information, refer to the CVE page(s) listed in the References section.
{
"affected": [
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "AlmaLinux:9",
"name": "git-lfs"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "3.6.1-4.el9_7"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"details": "Git Large File Storage (LFS) replaces large files such as audio samples, videos, datasets, and graphics with text pointers inside Git, while storing the file contents on a remote server. \n\nSecurity Fix(es): \n\n * git-lfs: Git LFS may write to arbitrary files via crafted symlinks (CVE-2025-26625)\n\n\nFor more details about the security issue(s), including the impact, a CVSS score, acknowledgments, and other related information, refer to the CVE page(s) listed in the References section.\n",
"id": "ALSA-2025:23744",
"modified": "2025-12-22T12:38:08Z",
"published": "2025-12-22T00:00:00Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2025:23744"
},
{
"type": "REPORT",
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-26625"
},
{
"type": "REPORT",
"url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/2404720"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://errata.almalinux.org/9/ALSA-2025-23744.html"
}
],
"related": [
"CVE-2025-26625"
],
"summary": "Important: git-lfs security update"
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…