CVE-1999-0655 (GCVE-0-1999-0655)

Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2000-02-04 10:00 – Updated: 2001-12-09 15:00
VLAI?

DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: None. Reason: this candidate is not about any specific product, protocol, or design, so it is out of scope of CVE. Notes: the former description is: "A service may include useful information in its banner or help function (such as the name and version), making it useful for information gathering activities.

Show details on NVD website

{
  "containers": {
    "cna": {
      "providerMetadata": {
        "dateUpdated": "2001-12-09T15:00:00.000Z",
        "orgId": "8254265b-2729-46b6-b9e3-3dfca2d5bfca",
        "shortName": "mitre"
      },
      "rejectedReasons": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER.  ConsultIDs: None.  Reason: this candidate is not about any specific product, protocol, or design, so it is out of scope of CVE.  Notes: the former description is: \"A service may include useful information in its banner or help function (such as the name and version), making it useful for information gathering activities."
        }
      ]
    }
  },
  "cveMetadata": {
    "assignerOrgId": "8254265b-2729-46b6-b9e3-3dfca2d5bfca",
    "assignerShortName": "mitre",
    "cveId": "CVE-1999-0655",
    "datePublished": "2000-02-04T10:00:00.000Z",
    "dateRejected": "2001-12-09T15:00:00.000Z",
    "dateReserved": "1999-06-07T04:00:00.000Z",
    "dateUpdated": "2001-12-09T15:00:00.000Z",
    "state": "REJECTED"
  },
  "dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
  "dataVersion": "5.0"
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.


Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…