CVE-2016-6582 (GCVE-0-2016-6582)

Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2017-01-23 21:00 – Updated: 2024-08-06 01:36
VLAI?
Summary
The Doorkeeper gem before 4.2.0 for Ruby might allow remote attackers to conduct replay attacks or revoke arbitrary tokens by leveraging failure to implement the OAuth 2.0 Token Revocation specification.
Severity ?
No CVSS data available.
CWE
  • n/a
Assigner
References
Show details on NVD website
To clipboard 

{
  "containers": {
    "adp": [
      {
        "providerMetadata": {
          "dateUpdated": "2024-08-06T01:36:28.287Z",
          "orgId": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
          "shortName": "CVE"
        },
        "references": [
          {
            "name": "92551",
            "tags": [
              "vdb-entry",
              "x_refsource_BID",
              "x_transferred"
            ],
            "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/92551"
          },
          {
            "tags": [
              "x_refsource_MISC",
              "x_transferred"
            ],
            "url": "http://packetstormsecurity.com/files/138430/Doorkeeper-4.1.0-Token-Revocation.html"
          },
          {
            "name": "20160818 [CVE-2016-6582] Doorkeeper gem does not revoke tokens \u0026 uses wrong auth/auth method",
            "tags": [
              "mailing-list",
              "x_refsource_BUGTRAQ",
              "x_transferred"
            ],
            "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/539268/100/0/threaded"
          },
          {
            "name": "20160822 [CVE-2016-6582] Doorkeeper gem does not revoke tokens \u0026 uses wrong auth/auth method",
            "tags": [
              "mailing-list",
              "x_refsource_FULLDISC",
              "x_transferred"
            ],
            "url": "http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2016/Aug/105"
          },
          {
            "tags": [
              "x_refsource_CONFIRM",
              "x_transferred"
            ],
            "url": "https://github.com/doorkeeper-gem/doorkeeper/releases/tag/v4.2.0"
          },
          {
            "tags": [
              "x_refsource_CONFIRM",
              "x_transferred"
            ],
            "url": "https://github.com/doorkeeper-gem/doorkeeper/issues/875"
          }
        ],
        "title": "CVE Program Container"
      }
    ],
    "cna": {
      "affected": [
        {
          "product": "n/a",
          "vendor": "n/a",
          "versions": [
            {
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "n/a"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "datePublic": "2016-08-18T00:00:00.000Z",
      "descriptions": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "The Doorkeeper gem before 4.2.0 for Ruby might allow remote attackers to conduct replay attacks or revoke arbitrary tokens by leveraging failure to implement the OAuth 2.0 Token Revocation specification."
        }
      ],
      "problemTypes": [
        {
          "descriptions": [
            {
              "description": "n/a",
              "lang": "en",
              "type": "text"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "providerMetadata": {
        "dateUpdated": "2018-10-09T18:57:01.000Z",
        "orgId": "8254265b-2729-46b6-b9e3-3dfca2d5bfca",
        "shortName": "mitre"
      },
      "references": [
        {
          "name": "92551",
          "tags": [
            "vdb-entry",
            "x_refsource_BID"
          ],
          "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/92551"
        },
        {
          "tags": [
            "x_refsource_MISC"
          ],
          "url": "http://packetstormsecurity.com/files/138430/Doorkeeper-4.1.0-Token-Revocation.html"
        },
        {
          "name": "20160818 [CVE-2016-6582] Doorkeeper gem does not revoke tokens \u0026 uses wrong auth/auth method",
          "tags": [
            "mailing-list",
            "x_refsource_BUGTRAQ"
          ],
          "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/539268/100/0/threaded"
        },
        {
          "name": "20160822 [CVE-2016-6582] Doorkeeper gem does not revoke tokens \u0026 uses wrong auth/auth method",
          "tags": [
            "mailing-list",
            "x_refsource_FULLDISC"
          ],
          "url": "http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2016/Aug/105"
        },
        {
          "tags": [
            "x_refsource_CONFIRM"
          ],
          "url": "https://github.com/doorkeeper-gem/doorkeeper/releases/tag/v4.2.0"
        },
        {
          "tags": [
            "x_refsource_CONFIRM"
          ],
          "url": "https://github.com/doorkeeper-gem/doorkeeper/issues/875"
        }
      ],
      "x_legacyV4Record": {
        "CVE_data_meta": {
          "ASSIGNER": "cve@mitre.org",
          "ID": "CVE-2016-6582",
          "STATE": "PUBLIC"
        },
        "affects": {
          "vendor": {
            "vendor_data": [
              {
                "product": {
                  "product_data": [
                    {
                      "product_name": "n/a",
                      "version": {
                        "version_data": [
                          {
                            "version_value": "n/a"
                          }
                        ]
                      }
                    }
                  ]
                },
                "vendor_name": "n/a"
              }
            ]
          }
        },
        "data_format": "MITRE",
        "data_type": "CVE",
        "data_version": "4.0",
        "description": {
          "description_data": [
            {
              "lang": "eng",
              "value": "The Doorkeeper gem before 4.2.0 for Ruby might allow remote attackers to conduct replay attacks or revoke arbitrary tokens by leveraging failure to implement the OAuth 2.0 Token Revocation specification."
            }
          ]
        },
        "problemtype": {
          "problemtype_data": [
            {
              "description": [
                {
                  "lang": "eng",
                  "value": "n/a"
                }
              ]
            }
          ]
        },
        "references": {
          "reference_data": [
            {
              "name": "92551",
              "refsource": "BID",
              "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/92551"
            },
            {
              "name": "http://packetstormsecurity.com/files/138430/Doorkeeper-4.1.0-Token-Revocation.html",
              "refsource": "MISC",
              "url": "http://packetstormsecurity.com/files/138430/Doorkeeper-4.1.0-Token-Revocation.html"
            },
            {
              "name": "20160818 [CVE-2016-6582] Doorkeeper gem does not revoke tokens \u0026 uses wrong auth/auth method",
              "refsource": "BUGTRAQ",
              "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/539268/100/0/threaded"
            },
            {
              "name": "20160822 [CVE-2016-6582] Doorkeeper gem does not revoke tokens \u0026 uses wrong auth/auth method",
              "refsource": "FULLDISC",
              "url": "http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2016/Aug/105"
            },
            {
              "name": "https://github.com/doorkeeper-gem/doorkeeper/releases/tag/v4.2.0",
              "refsource": "CONFIRM",
              "url": "https://github.com/doorkeeper-gem/doorkeeper/releases/tag/v4.2.0"
            },
            {
              "name": "https://github.com/doorkeeper-gem/doorkeeper/issues/875",
              "refsource": "CONFIRM",
              "url": "https://github.com/doorkeeper-gem/doorkeeper/issues/875"
            }
          ]
        }
      }
    }
  },
  "cveMetadata": {
    "assignerOrgId": "8254265b-2729-46b6-b9e3-3dfca2d5bfca",
    "assignerShortName": "mitre",
    "cveId": "CVE-2016-6582",
    "datePublished": "2017-01-23T21:00:00.000Z",
    "dateReserved": "2016-08-03T00:00:00.000Z",
    "dateUpdated": "2024-08-06T01:36:28.287Z",
    "state": "PUBLISHED"
  },
  "dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
  "dataVersion": "5.1"
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.




Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.



Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.