CVE-2021-41531 (GCVE-0-2021-41531)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2021-09-21 13:23 – Updated: 2024-09-16 20:27
VLAI?
Title
Invalid RPKI data could disable Route Origin Validation on RTR clients.
Summary
NLnet Labs Routinator prior to 0.10.0 produces invalid RTR payload if an RPKI CA uses too large values in the max-length parameter in a ROA. This will lead to RTR clients such as routers to reject the RPKI data set, effectively disabling Route Origin Validation.
Severity ?
No CVSS data available.
CWE
- CWE-1288 - Improper Validation of Consistency within Input
Assigner
References
| URL | Tags | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|||||
Impacted products
| Vendor | Product | Version | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NLnet Labs | Routinator |
Affected:
unspecified , ≤ 0.9.0
(custom)
|
Credits
We would like to thank Job Snijders for reporting the issue.
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2024-08-04T03:15:29.202Z",
"orgId": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"shortName": "CVE"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC",
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://www.nlnetlabs.nl/downloads/routinator/CVE-2021-41531.txt"
}
],
"title": "CVE Program Container"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"product": "Routinator",
"vendor": "NLnet Labs",
"versions": [
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "0.9.0",
"status": "affected",
"version": "unspecified",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
}
],
"credits": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "We would like to thank Job Snijders for reporting the issue."
}
],
"datePublic": "2021-09-21T00:00:00.000Z",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "NLnet Labs Routinator prior to 0.10.0 produces invalid RTR payload if an RPKI CA uses too large values in the max-length parameter in a ROA. This will lead to RTR clients such as routers to reject the RPKI data set, effectively disabling Route Origin Validation."
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-1288",
"description": "CWE-1288: Improper Validation of Consistency within Input",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2021-09-21T13:23:17.000Z",
"orgId": "206fc3a0-e175-490b-9eaa-a5738056c9f6",
"shortName": "NLnet Labs"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://www.nlnetlabs.nl/downloads/routinator/CVE-2021-41531.txt"
}
],
"title": "Invalid RPKI data could disable Route Origin Validation on RTR clients.",
"x_legacyV4Record": {
"CVE_data_meta": {
"ASSIGNER": "sep@nlnetlabs.nl",
"DATE_PUBLIC": "2021-09-21T00:00:00.000Z",
"ID": "CVE-2021-41531",
"STATE": "PUBLIC",
"TITLE": "Invalid RPKI data could disable Route Origin Validation on RTR clients."
},
"affects": {
"vendor": {
"vendor_data": [
{
"product": {
"product_data": [
{
"product_name": "Routinator",
"version": {
"version_data": [
{
"version_affected": "\u003c=",
"version_value": "0.9.0"
}
]
}
}
]
},
"vendor_name": "NLnet Labs"
}
]
}
},
"credit": [
{
"lang": "eng",
"value": "We would like to thank Job Snijders for reporting the issue."
}
],
"data_format": "MITRE",
"data_type": "CVE",
"data_version": "4.0",
"description": {
"description_data": [
{
"lang": "eng",
"value": "NLnet Labs Routinator prior to 0.10.0 produces invalid RTR payload if an RPKI CA uses too large values in the max-length parameter in a ROA. This will lead to RTR clients such as routers to reject the RPKI data set, effectively disabling Route Origin Validation."
}
]
},
"problemtype": {
"problemtype_data": [
{
"description": [
{
"lang": "eng",
"value": "CWE-1288: Improper Validation of Consistency within Input"
}
]
}
]
},
"references": {
"reference_data": [
{
"name": "https://www.nlnetlabs.nl/downloads/routinator/CVE-2021-41531.txt",
"refsource": "MISC",
"url": "https://www.nlnetlabs.nl/downloads/routinator/CVE-2021-41531.txt"
}
]
}
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "206fc3a0-e175-490b-9eaa-a5738056c9f6",
"assignerShortName": "NLnet Labs",
"cveId": "CVE-2021-41531",
"datePublished": "2021-09-21T13:23:17.982Z",
"dateReserved": "2021-09-20T00:00:00.000Z",
"dateUpdated": "2024-09-16T20:27:40.850Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.1"
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…