CVE-2024-12802 (GCVE-0-2024-12802)

Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2025-01-09 09:08 – Updated: 2025-01-09 14:30
VLAI?
Summary
SSL-VPN MFA Bypass in SonicWALL SSL-VPN can arise in specific cases due to the separate handling of UPN (User Principal Name) and SAM (Security Account Manager) account names when integrated with Microsoft Active Directory, allowing MFA to be configured independently for each login method and potentially enabling attackers to bypass MFA by exploiting the alternative account name.
Severity ?
9.1 (Critical)
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
CWE
  • CWE-305 - Authentication Bypass by Primary Weakness
Assigner
References
Impacted products
Vendor Product Version
SonicWall SonicOS Affected: 6.5.4.4-44v-21-2457 and older versions
Affected: 6.5.4.15-117n and older versions
Affected: 7.0.1-5161 and older versions
Affected: 7.1.1-7058 and older versions
Affected: 7.1.2-7019
Affected: 8.0.0-8035
Create a notification for this product.
Show details on NVD website
To clipboard 

{
  "containers": {
    "adp": [
      {
        "metrics": [
          {
            "cvssV3_1": {
              "attackComplexity": "LOW",
              "attackVector": "NETWORK",
              "availabilityImpact": "NONE",
              "baseScore": 9.1,
              "baseSeverity": "CRITICAL",
              "confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
              "integrityImpact": "HIGH",
              "privilegesRequired": "NONE",
              "scope": "UNCHANGED",
              "userInteraction": "NONE",
              "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N",
              "version": "3.1"
            }
          },
          {
            "other": {
              "content": {
                "id": "CVE-2024-12802",
                "options": [
                  {
                    "Exploitation": "none"
                  },
                  {
                    "Automatable": "yes"
                  },
                  {
                    "Technical Impact": "total"
                  }
                ],
                "role": "CISA Coordinator",
                "timestamp": "2025-01-09T14:29:43.478423Z",
                "version": "2.0.3"
              },
              "type": "ssvc"
            }
          }
        ],
        "providerMetadata": {
          "dateUpdated": "2025-01-09T14:30:34.676Z",
          "orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
          "shortName": "CISA-ADP"
        },
        "title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
      }
    ],
    "cna": {
      "affected": [
        {
          "defaultStatus": "unknown",
          "platforms": [
            "Gen6 NSv",
            "Gen6 Hardware",
            "Gen7 Hardware",
            "Gen7 NSv",
            "TZ80"
          ],
          "product": "SonicOS",
          "vendor": "SonicWall",
          "versions": [
            {
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "6.5.4.4-44v-21-2457 and older versions"
            },
            {
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "6.5.4.15-117n and older versions"
            },
            {
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "7.0.1-5161 and older versions"
            },
            {
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "7.1.1-7058 and older versions"
            },
            {
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "7.1.2-7019"
            },
            {
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "8.0.0-8035"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "datePublic": "2025-01-08T07:16:00.000Z",
      "descriptions": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "supportingMedia": [
            {
              "base64": false,
              "type": "text/html",
              "value": "\u003cspan style=\"background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255);\"\u003eSSL-VPN MFA Bypass in SonicWALL SSL-VPN can arise in specific cases due to the separate handling of UPN (User Principal Name) and SAM (Security Account Manager) account names when integrated with Microsoft Active Directory, allowing MFA to be configured independently for each login method and potentially enabling attackers to bypass MFA by exploiting the alternative account name.\u003c/span\u003e"
            }
          ],
          "value": "SSL-VPN MFA Bypass in SonicWALL SSL-VPN can arise in specific cases due to the separate handling of UPN (User Principal Name) and SAM (Security Account Manager) account names when integrated with Microsoft Active Directory, allowing MFA to be configured independently for each login method and potentially enabling attackers to bypass MFA by exploiting the alternative account name."
        }
      ],
      "problemTypes": [
        {
          "descriptions": [
            {
              "cweId": "CWE-305",
              "description": "CWE-305 Authentication Bypass by Primary Weakness",
              "lang": "en",
              "type": "CWE"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "providerMetadata": {
        "dateUpdated": "2025-01-09T09:08:26.012Z",
        "orgId": "44b2ff79-1416-4492-88bb-ed0da00c7315",
        "shortName": "sonicwall"
      },
      "references": [
        {
          "tags": [
            "vendor-advisory"
          ],
          "url": "https://psirt.global.sonicwall.com/vuln-detail/SNWLID-2025-0001"
        }
      ],
      "source": {
        "advisory": "SNWLID-2025-0001",
        "discovery": "EXTERNAL"
      },
      "x_generator": {
        "engine": "Vulnogram 0.2.0"
      }
    }
  },
  "cveMetadata": {
    "assignerOrgId": "44b2ff79-1416-4492-88bb-ed0da00c7315",
    "assignerShortName": "sonicwall",
    "cveId": "CVE-2024-12802",
    "datePublished": "2025-01-09T09:08:26.012Z",
    "dateReserved": "2024-12-19T16:22:43.405Z",
    "dateUpdated": "2025-01-09T14:30:34.676Z",
    "state": "PUBLISHED"
  },
  "dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
  "dataVersion": "5.1",
  "vulnerability-lookup:meta": {
    "vulnrichment": {
      "containers": "{\"adp\": [{\"title\": \"CISA ADP Vulnrichment\", \"metrics\": [{\"cvssV3_1\": {\"scope\": \"UNCHANGED\", \"version\": \"3.1\", \"baseScore\": 9.1, \"attackVector\": \"NETWORK\", \"baseSeverity\": \"CRITICAL\", \"vectorString\": \"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N\", \"integrityImpact\": \"HIGH\", \"userInteraction\": \"NONE\", \"attackComplexity\": \"LOW\", \"availabilityImpact\": \"NONE\", \"privilegesRequired\": \"NONE\", \"confidentialityImpact\": \"HIGH\"}}, {\"other\": {\"type\": \"ssvc\", \"content\": {\"id\": \"CVE-2024-12802\", \"role\": \"CISA Coordinator\", \"options\": [{\"Exploitation\": \"none\"}, {\"Automatable\": \"yes\"}, {\"Technical Impact\": \"total\"}], \"version\": \"2.0.3\", \"timestamp\": \"2025-01-09T14:29:43.478423Z\"}}}], \"providerMetadata\": {\"orgId\": \"134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0\", \"shortName\": \"CISA-ADP\", \"dateUpdated\": \"2025-01-09T14:30:28.552Z\"}}], \"cna\": {\"source\": {\"advisory\": \"SNWLID-2025-0001\", \"discovery\": \"EXTERNAL\"}, \"affected\": [{\"vendor\": \"SonicWall\", \"product\": \"SonicOS\", \"versions\": [{\"status\": \"affected\", \"version\": \"6.5.4.4-44v-21-2457 and older versions\"}, {\"status\": \"affected\", \"version\": \"6.5.4.15-117n and older versions\"}, {\"status\": \"affected\", \"version\": \"7.0.1-5161 and older versions\"}, {\"status\": \"affected\", \"version\": \"7.1.1-7058 and older versions\"}, {\"status\": \"affected\", \"version\": \"7.1.2-7019\"}, {\"status\": \"affected\", \"version\": \"8.0.0-8035\"}], \"platforms\": [\"Gen6 NSv\", \"Gen6 Hardware\", \"Gen7 Hardware\", \"Gen7 NSv\", \"TZ80\"], \"defaultStatus\": \"unknown\"}], \"datePublic\": \"2025-01-08T07:16:00.000Z\", \"references\": [{\"url\": \"https://psirt.global.sonicwall.com/vuln-detail/SNWLID-2025-0001\", \"tags\": [\"vendor-advisory\"]}], \"x_generator\": {\"engine\": \"Vulnogram 0.2.0\"}, \"descriptions\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"value\": \"SSL-VPN MFA Bypass in SonicWALL SSL-VPN can arise in specific cases due to the separate handling of UPN (User Principal Name) and SAM (Security Account Manager) account names when integrated with Microsoft Active Directory, allowing MFA to be configured independently for each login method and potentially enabling attackers to bypass MFA by exploiting the alternative account name.\", \"supportingMedia\": [{\"type\": \"text/html\", \"value\": \"\u003cspan style=\\\"background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255);\\\"\u003eSSL-VPN MFA Bypass in SonicWALL SSL-VPN can arise in specific cases due to the separate handling of UPN (User Principal Name) and SAM (Security Account Manager) account names when integrated with Microsoft Active Directory, allowing MFA to be configured independently for each login method and potentially enabling attackers to bypass MFA by exploiting the alternative account name.\u003c/span\u003e\", \"base64\": false}]}], \"problemTypes\": [{\"descriptions\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"type\": \"CWE\", \"cweId\": \"CWE-305\", \"description\": \"CWE-305 Authentication Bypass by Primary Weakness\"}]}], \"providerMetadata\": {\"orgId\": \"44b2ff79-1416-4492-88bb-ed0da00c7315\", \"shortName\": \"sonicwall\", \"dateUpdated\": \"2025-01-09T09:08:26.012Z\"}}}",
      "cveMetadata": "{\"cveId\": \"CVE-2024-12802\", \"state\": \"PUBLISHED\", \"dateUpdated\": \"2025-01-09T14:30:34.676Z\", \"dateReserved\": \"2024-12-19T16:22:43.405Z\", \"assignerOrgId\": \"44b2ff79-1416-4492-88bb-ed0da00c7315\", \"datePublished\": \"2025-01-09T09:08:26.012Z\", \"assignerShortName\": \"sonicwall\"}",
      "dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
      "dataVersion": "5.1"
    }
  }
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.




Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.



Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.