CVE-2024-43378 (GCVE-0-2024-43378)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2024-08-15 23:53 – Updated: 2024-09-03 18:02
VLAI?
Title
calamares-nixos-extensions LUKS keyfile exposure regression on legacy BIOS systems
Summary
calamares-nixos-extensions provides Calamares branding and modules for NixOS, a distribution of GNU/Linux. Users who installed NixOS through the graphical installer who used manual disk partitioning to create a setup where the system was booted via legacy BIOS rather than UEFI; some disk partitions are encrypted; but the partitions containing either `/` or `/boot` are unencrypted; have their LUKS disk encryption key file in plain text either in `/crypto_keyfile.bin`, or in a CPIO archive attached to their NixOS initrd. `nixos-install` is not affected, nor are UEFI installations, nor was the default automatic partitioning configuration on legacy BIOS systems. The problem has been fixed in calamares-nixos-extensions 0.3.17, which was included in NixOS. The current installer images for the NixOS 24.05 and unstable (24.11) channels are unaffected. The fix reached 24.05 at 2024-08-13 20:06:59 UTC, and unstable at 2024-08-15 09:00:20 UTC. Installer images downloaded before those times may be vulnerable. The best solution for affected users is probably to back up their data and do a complete reinstallation. However, the mitigation procedure in GHSA-3rvf-24q2-24ww should work solely for the case where `/` is encrypted but `/boot` is not. If `/` is unencrypted, then the `/crypto_keyfile.bin` file will need to be deleted in addition to the remediation steps in the previous advisory. This issue is a partial regression of CVE-2023-36476 / GHSA-3rvf-24q2-24ww, which was more severe as it applied to the default configuration on BIOS systems.
Severity ?
7.8 (High)
CWE
- CWE-256 - Plaintext Storage of a Password
Assigner
References
| URL | Tags | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|||||||||||||||||
Impacted products
| Vendor | Product | Version | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NixOS | calamares-nixos-extensions |
Affected:
< 0.3.17
|
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"affected": [
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:2.3:a:nixos:calamares-nixos-extensions:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*"
],
"defaultStatus": "unknown",
"product": "calamares-nixos-extensions",
"vendor": "nixos",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "0.3.17",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2024-43378",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "total"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2024-08-19T20:54:33.909326Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2024-09-03T18:02:47.756Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"product": "calamares-nixos-extensions",
"vendor": "NixOS",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "\u003c 0.3.17"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "calamares-nixos-extensions provides Calamares branding and modules for NixOS, a distribution of GNU/Linux. Users who installed NixOS through the graphical installer who used manual disk partitioning to create a setup where the system was booted via legacy BIOS rather than UEFI; some disk partitions are encrypted; but the partitions containing either `/` or `/boot` are unencrypted; have their LUKS disk encryption key file in plain text either in `/crypto_keyfile.bin`, or in a CPIO archive attached to their NixOS initrd. `nixos-install` is not affected, nor are UEFI installations, nor was the default automatic partitioning configuration on legacy BIOS systems. The problem has been fixed in calamares-nixos-extensions 0.3.17, which was included in NixOS. The current installer images for the NixOS 24.05 and unstable (24.11) channels are unaffected. The fix reached 24.05 at 2024-08-13 20:06:59 UTC, and unstable at 2024-08-15 09:00:20 UTC. Installer images downloaded before those times may be vulnerable. The best solution for affected users is probably to back up their data and do a complete reinstallation. However, the mitigation procedure in GHSA-3rvf-24q2-24ww should work solely for the case where `/` is encrypted but `/boot` is not. If `/` is unencrypted, then the `/crypto_keyfile.bin` file will need to be deleted in addition to the remediation steps in the previous advisory. This issue is a partial regression of CVE-2023-36476 / GHSA-3rvf-24q2-24ww, which was more severe as it applied to the default configuration on BIOS systems."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "HIGH",
"attackVector": "LOCAL",
"availabilityImpact": "NONE",
"baseScore": 7.8,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"integrityImpact": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "CHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N",
"version": "3.1"
}
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-256",
"description": "CWE-256: Plaintext Storage of a Password",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2024-08-15T23:53:07.103Z",
"orgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"shortName": "GitHub_M"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "https://github.com/NixOS/calamares-nixos-extensions/security/advisories/GHSA-vfxf-gpmj-2p25",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_CONFIRM"
],
"url": "https://github.com/NixOS/calamares-nixos-extensions/security/advisories/GHSA-vfxf-gpmj-2p25"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/NixOS/calamares-nixos-extensions/security/advisories/GHSA-3rvf-24q2-24ww",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://github.com/NixOS/calamares-nixos-extensions/security/advisories/GHSA-3rvf-24q2-24ww"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/NixOS/calamares-nixos-extensions/pull/43",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://github.com/NixOS/calamares-nixos-extensions/pull/43"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/331607",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/331607"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/334252",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/334252"
}
],
"source": {
"advisory": "GHSA-vfxf-gpmj-2p25",
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"title": "calamares-nixos-extensions LUKS keyfile exposure regression on legacy BIOS systems"
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"assignerShortName": "GitHub_M",
"cveId": "CVE-2024-43378",
"datePublished": "2024-08-15T23:53:07.103Z",
"dateReserved": "2024-08-09T14:23:55.514Z",
"dateUpdated": "2024-09-03T18:02:47.756Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.1",
"vulnerability-lookup:meta": {
"vulnrichment": {
"containers": "{\"adp\": [{\"title\": \"CISA ADP Vulnrichment\", \"metrics\": [{\"other\": {\"type\": \"ssvc\", \"content\": {\"id\": \"CVE-2024-43378\", \"role\": \"CISA Coordinator\", \"options\": [{\"Exploitation\": \"none\"}, {\"Automatable\": \"no\"}, {\"Technical Impact\": \"total\"}], \"version\": \"2.0.3\", \"timestamp\": \"2024-08-19T20:54:33.909326Z\"}}}], \"affected\": [{\"cpes\": [\"cpe:2.3:a:nixos:calamares-nixos-extensions:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\"], \"vendor\": \"nixos\", \"product\": \"calamares-nixos-extensions\", \"versions\": [{\"status\": \"affected\", \"version\": \"0\", \"lessThan\": \"0.3.17\", \"versionType\": \"custom\"}], \"defaultStatus\": \"unknown\"}], \"providerMetadata\": {\"orgId\": \"134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0\", \"shortName\": \"CISA-ADP\", \"dateUpdated\": \"2024-09-03T18:02:41.060Z\"}}], \"cna\": {\"title\": \"calamares-nixos-extensions LUKS keyfile exposure regression on legacy BIOS systems\", \"source\": {\"advisory\": \"GHSA-vfxf-gpmj-2p25\", \"discovery\": \"UNKNOWN\"}, \"metrics\": [{\"cvssV3_1\": {\"scope\": \"CHANGED\", \"version\": \"3.1\", \"baseScore\": 7.8, \"attackVector\": \"LOCAL\", \"baseSeverity\": \"HIGH\", \"vectorString\": \"CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N\", \"integrityImpact\": \"HIGH\", \"userInteraction\": \"NONE\", \"attackComplexity\": \"HIGH\", \"availabilityImpact\": \"NONE\", \"privilegesRequired\": \"NONE\", \"confidentialityImpact\": \"HIGH\"}}], \"affected\": [{\"vendor\": \"NixOS\", \"product\": \"calamares-nixos-extensions\", \"versions\": [{\"status\": \"affected\", \"version\": \"\u003c 0.3.17\"}]}], \"references\": [{\"url\": \"https://github.com/NixOS/calamares-nixos-extensions/security/advisories/GHSA-vfxf-gpmj-2p25\", \"name\": \"https://github.com/NixOS/calamares-nixos-extensions/security/advisories/GHSA-vfxf-gpmj-2p25\", \"tags\": [\"x_refsource_CONFIRM\"]}, {\"url\": \"https://github.com/NixOS/calamares-nixos-extensions/security/advisories/GHSA-3rvf-24q2-24ww\", \"name\": \"https://github.com/NixOS/calamares-nixos-extensions/security/advisories/GHSA-3rvf-24q2-24ww\", \"tags\": [\"x_refsource_MISC\"]}, {\"url\": \"https://github.com/NixOS/calamares-nixos-extensions/pull/43\", \"name\": \"https://github.com/NixOS/calamares-nixos-extensions/pull/43\", \"tags\": [\"x_refsource_MISC\"]}, {\"url\": \"https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/331607\", \"name\": \"https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/331607\", \"tags\": [\"x_refsource_MISC\"]}, {\"url\": \"https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/334252\", \"name\": \"https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/334252\", \"tags\": [\"x_refsource_MISC\"]}], \"descriptions\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"value\": \"calamares-nixos-extensions provides Calamares branding and modules for NixOS, a distribution of GNU/Linux. Users who installed NixOS through the graphical installer who used manual disk partitioning to create a setup where the system was booted via legacy BIOS rather than UEFI; some disk partitions are encrypted; but the partitions containing either `/` or `/boot` are unencrypted; have their LUKS disk encryption key file in plain text either in `/crypto_keyfile.bin`, or in a CPIO archive attached to their NixOS initrd. `nixos-install` is not affected, nor are UEFI installations, nor was the default automatic partitioning configuration on legacy BIOS systems. The problem has been fixed in calamares-nixos-extensions 0.3.17, which was included in NixOS. The current installer images for the NixOS 24.05 and unstable (24.11) channels are unaffected. The fix reached 24.05 at 2024-08-13 20:06:59 UTC, and unstable at 2024-08-15 09:00:20 UTC. Installer images downloaded before those times may be vulnerable. The best solution for affected users is probably to back up their data and do a complete reinstallation. However, the mitigation procedure in GHSA-3rvf-24q2-24ww should work solely for the case where `/` is encrypted but `/boot` is not. If `/` is unencrypted, then the `/crypto_keyfile.bin` file will need to be deleted in addition to the remediation steps in the previous advisory. This issue is a partial regression of CVE-2023-36476 / GHSA-3rvf-24q2-24ww, which was more severe as it applied to the default configuration on BIOS systems.\"}], \"problemTypes\": [{\"descriptions\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"type\": \"CWE\", \"cweId\": \"CWE-256\", \"description\": \"CWE-256: Plaintext Storage of a Password\"}]}], \"providerMetadata\": {\"orgId\": \"a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa\", \"shortName\": \"GitHub_M\", \"dateUpdated\": \"2024-08-15T23:53:07.103Z\"}}}",
"cveMetadata": "{\"cveId\": \"CVE-2024-43378\", \"state\": \"PUBLISHED\", \"dateUpdated\": \"2024-09-03T18:02:47.756Z\", \"dateReserved\": \"2024-08-09T14:23:55.514Z\", \"assignerOrgId\": \"a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa\", \"datePublished\": \"2024-08-15T23:53:07.103Z\", \"assignerShortName\": \"GitHub_M\"}",
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.1"
}
}
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…