CVE-2024-56374 (GCVE-0-2024-56374)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2025-01-14 00:00 – Updated: 2025-02-12 20:31
VLAI?
Summary
An issue was discovered in Django 5.1 before 5.1.5, 5.0 before 5.0.11, and 4.2 before 4.2.18. Lack of upper-bound limit enforcement in strings passed when performing IPv6 validation could lead to a potential denial-of-service attack. The undocumented and private functions clean_ipv6_address and is_valid_ipv6_address are vulnerable, as is the django.forms.GenericIPAddressField form field. (The django.db.models.GenericIPAddressField model field is not affected.)
Severity ?
5.8 (Medium)
CWE
- CWE-770 - Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling
Assigner
References
Impacted products
| Vendor | Product | Version | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| djangoproject | Django |
Affected:
4.2 , < 4.2.18
(custom)
Affected: 5.0 , < 5.0.11 (custom) Affected: 5.1 , < 5.1.5 (custom) |
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-01-23T18:03:28.376Z",
"orgId": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"shortName": "CVE"
},
"references": [
{
"url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2025/01/14/2"
},
{
"url": "https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2025/01/msg00024.html"
}
],
"title": "CVE Program Container"
},
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2024-56374",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "yes"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2025-01-15T19:40:35.398718Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-02-12T20:31:20.698Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unknown",
"product": "Django",
"vendor": "djangoproject",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "4.2.18",
"status": "affected",
"version": "4.2",
"versionType": "custom"
},
{
"lessThan": "5.0.11",
"status": "affected",
"version": "5.0",
"versionType": "custom"
},
{
"lessThan": "5.1.5",
"status": "affected",
"version": "5.1",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
}
],
"cpeApplicability": [
{
"nodes": [
{
"cpeMatch": [
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:djangoproject:django:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"versionEndExcluding": "4.2.18",
"versionStartIncluding": "4.2",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:djangoproject:django:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"versionEndExcluding": "5.0.11",
"versionStartIncluding": "5.0",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:djangoproject:django:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"versionEndExcluding": "5.1.5",
"versionStartIncluding": "5.1",
"vulnerable": true
}
],
"negate": false,
"operator": "OR"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "An issue was discovered in Django 5.1 before 5.1.5, 5.0 before 5.0.11, and 4.2 before 4.2.18. Lack of upper-bound limit enforcement in strings passed when performing IPv6 validation could lead to a potential denial-of-service attack. The undocumented and private functions clean_ipv6_address and is_valid_ipv6_address are vulnerable, as is the django.forms.GenericIPAddressField form field. (The django.db.models.GenericIPAddressField model field is not affected.)"
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"baseScore": 5.8,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:N/A:L",
"version": "3.1"
}
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-770",
"description": "CWE-770 Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-01-14T19:07:03.855Z",
"orgId": "8254265b-2729-46b6-b9e3-3dfca2d5bfca",
"shortName": "mitre"
},
"references": [
{
"url": "https://docs.djangoproject.com/en/dev/releases/security/"
},
{
"url": "https://groups.google.com/g/django-announce"
},
{
"url": "https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2025/jan/14/security-releases/"
}
],
"x_generator": {
"engine": "enrichogram 0.0.1"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "8254265b-2729-46b6-b9e3-3dfca2d5bfca",
"assignerShortName": "mitre",
"cveId": "CVE-2024-56374",
"datePublished": "2025-01-14T00:00:00.000Z",
"dateReserved": "2024-12-22T00:00:00.000Z",
"dateUpdated": "2025-02-12T20:31:20.698Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.1",
"vulnerability-lookup:meta": {
"vulnrichment": {
"containers": "{\"adp\": [{\"title\": \"CVE Program Container\", \"references\": [{\"url\": \"http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2025/01/14/2\"}, {\"url\": \"https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2025/01/msg00024.html\"}], \"providerMetadata\": {\"orgId\": \"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\", \"shortName\": \"CVE\", \"dateUpdated\": \"2025-01-23T18:03:28.376Z\"}}, {\"title\": \"CISA ADP Vulnrichment\", \"metrics\": [{\"other\": {\"type\": \"ssvc\", \"content\": {\"id\": \"CVE-2024-56374\", \"role\": \"CISA Coordinator\", \"options\": [{\"Exploitation\": \"none\"}, {\"Automatable\": \"yes\"}, {\"Technical Impact\": \"partial\"}], \"version\": \"2.0.3\", \"timestamp\": \"2025-01-15T19:40:35.398718Z\"}}}], \"providerMetadata\": {\"orgId\": \"134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0\", \"shortName\": \"CISA-ADP\", \"dateUpdated\": \"2025-02-12T20:26:02.400Z\"}}], \"cna\": {\"metrics\": [{\"cvssV3_1\": {\"version\": \"3.1\", \"baseScore\": 5.8, \"baseSeverity\": \"MEDIUM\", \"vectorString\": \"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:N/A:L\"}}], \"affected\": [{\"vendor\": \"djangoproject\", \"product\": \"Django\", \"versions\": [{\"status\": \"affected\", \"version\": \"4.2\", \"lessThan\": \"4.2.18\", \"versionType\": \"custom\"}, {\"status\": \"affected\", \"version\": \"5.0\", \"lessThan\": \"5.0.11\", \"versionType\": \"custom\"}, {\"status\": \"affected\", \"version\": \"5.1\", \"lessThan\": \"5.1.5\", \"versionType\": \"custom\"}], \"defaultStatus\": \"unknown\"}], \"references\": [{\"url\": \"https://docs.djangoproject.com/en/dev/releases/security/\"}, {\"url\": \"https://groups.google.com/g/django-announce\"}, {\"url\": \"https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2025/jan/14/security-releases/\"}], \"x_generator\": {\"engine\": \"enrichogram 0.0.1\"}, \"descriptions\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"value\": \"An issue was discovered in Django 5.1 before 5.1.5, 5.0 before 5.0.11, and 4.2 before 4.2.18. Lack of upper-bound limit enforcement in strings passed when performing IPv6 validation could lead to a potential denial-of-service attack. The undocumented and private functions clean_ipv6_address and is_valid_ipv6_address are vulnerable, as is the django.forms.GenericIPAddressField form field. (The django.db.models.GenericIPAddressField model field is not affected.)\"}], \"problemTypes\": [{\"descriptions\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"type\": \"CWE\", \"cweId\": \"CWE-770\", \"description\": \"CWE-770 Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling\"}]}], \"cpeApplicability\": [{\"nodes\": [{\"negate\": false, \"cpeMatch\": [{\"criteria\": \"cpe:2.3:a:djangoproject:django:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\", \"vulnerable\": true, \"versionEndExcluding\": \"4.2.18\", \"versionStartIncluding\": \"4.2\"}, {\"criteria\": \"cpe:2.3:a:djangoproject:django:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\", \"vulnerable\": true, \"versionEndExcluding\": \"5.0.11\", \"versionStartIncluding\": \"5.0\"}, {\"criteria\": \"cpe:2.3:a:djangoproject:django:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\", \"vulnerable\": true, \"versionEndExcluding\": \"5.1.5\", \"versionStartIncluding\": \"5.1\"}], \"operator\": \"OR\"}]}], \"providerMetadata\": {\"orgId\": \"8254265b-2729-46b6-b9e3-3dfca2d5bfca\", \"shortName\": \"mitre\", \"dateUpdated\": \"2025-01-14T19:07:03.855Z\"}}}",
"cveMetadata": "{\"cveId\": \"CVE-2024-56374\", \"state\": \"PUBLISHED\", \"dateUpdated\": \"2025-02-12T20:31:20.698Z\", \"dateReserved\": \"2024-12-22T00:00:00.000Z\", \"assignerOrgId\": \"8254265b-2729-46b6-b9e3-3dfca2d5bfca\", \"datePublished\": \"2025-01-14T00:00:00.000Z\", \"assignerShortName\": \"mitre\"}",
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.1"
}
}
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…