CVE-2025-22233 (GCVE-0-2025-22233)

Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2025-05-16 19:14 – Updated: 2025-05-17 02:37
VLAI?
Title
Spring Framework DataBinder Case Sensitive Match Exception
Summary
CVE-2024-38820 ensured Locale-independent, lowercase conversion for both the configured disallowedFields patterns and for request parameter names. However, there are still cases where it is possible to bypass the disallowedFields checks. Affected Spring Products and Versions Spring Framework: * 6.2.0 - 6.2.6 * 6.1.0 - 6.1.19 * 6.0.0 - 6.0.27 * 5.3.0 - 5.3.42 * Older, unsupported versions are also affected Mitigation Users of affected versions should upgrade to the corresponding fixed version. Affected version(s)Fix Version Availability 6.2.x 6.2.7 OSS6.1.x 6.1.20 OSS6.0.x 6.0.28 Commercial https://enterprise.spring.io/ 5.3.x 5.3.43 Commercial https://enterprise.spring.io/ No further mitigation steps are necessary. Generally, we recommend using a dedicated model object with properties only for data binding, or using constructor binding since constructor arguments explicitly declare what to bind together with turning off setter binding through the declarativeBinding flag. See the Model Design section in the reference documentation. For setting binding, prefer the use of allowedFields (an explicit list) over disallowedFields. Credit This issue was responsibly reported by the TERASOLUNA Framework Development Team from NTT DATA Group Corporation.
CWE
  • CWE-20 - Improper Input Validation
Assigner
Impacted products
Vendor Product Version
Spring Spring Framework Affected: 6.2.0 , ≤ 6.2.6 (Framework)
Affected: 6.1.0 , ≤ 6.1.19 (Framework)
Affected: 6.0.0 , ≤ 6.0.27 (Enterprise Framework)
Affected: 5.3.0 , ≤ 5.3.42 (Enterprise Framework)
Unaffected: 6.2.7 (Framework)
Unaffected: 6.1.20 (Framework)
Unaffected: 6.0.28 (Enterprise Framework)
Unaffected: 5.3.43 (Entrprise Framework)
Create a notification for this product.
Show details on NVD website

{
  "containers": {
    "adp": [
      {
        "metrics": [
          {
            "other": {
              "content": {
                "id": "CVE-2025-22233",
                "options": [
                  {
                    "Exploitation": "none"
                  },
                  {
                    "Automatable": "no"
                  },
                  {
                    "Technical Impact": "partial"
                  }
                ],
                "role": "CISA Coordinator",
                "timestamp": "2025-05-17T02:36:53.736871Z",
                "version": "2.0.3"
              },
              "type": "ssvc"
            }
          }
        ],
        "providerMetadata": {
          "dateUpdated": "2025-05-17T02:37:03.191Z",
          "orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
          "shortName": "CISA-ADP"
        },
        "title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
      }
    ],
    "cna": {
      "affected": [
        {
          "defaultStatus": "affected",
          "product": "Spring Framework",
          "vendor": "Spring",
          "versions": [
            {
              "lessThanOrEqual": "6.2.6",
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "6.2.0",
              "versionType": "Framework"
            },
            {
              "lessThanOrEqual": "6.1.19",
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "6.1.0",
              "versionType": "Framework"
            },
            {
              "lessThanOrEqual": "6.0.27",
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "6.0.0",
              "versionType": "Enterprise Framework"
            },
            {
              "lessThanOrEqual": "5.3.42",
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "5.3.0",
              "versionType": "Enterprise Framework"
            },
            {
              "status": "unaffected",
              "version": "6.2.7",
              "versionType": "Framework"
            },
            {
              "status": "unaffected",
              "version": "6.1.20",
              "versionType": "Framework"
            },
            {
              "status": "unaffected",
              "version": "6.0.28",
              "versionType": "Enterprise Framework"
            },
            {
              "status": "unaffected",
              "version": "5.3.43",
              "versionType": "Entrprise Framework"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "datePublic": "2025-05-15T15:02:00.000Z",
      "descriptions": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "supportingMedia": [
            {
              "base64": false,
              "type": "text/html",
              "value": "CVE-2024-38820 ensured Locale-independent, lowercase conversion for both the configured disallowedFields patterns and for request parameter names. However, there are still cases where it is possible to bypass the disallowedFields checks.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\u003cb\u003eAffected Spring Products and Versions\u003c/b\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eSpring Framework:\u003cbr\u003e\u003cul\u003e\u003cli\u003e6.2.0 - 6.2.6\u003cbr\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e6.1.0 - 6.1.19\u003cbr\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e6.0.0 - 6.0.27\u003cbr\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e5.3.0 - 5.3.42\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003eOlder, unsupported versions are also affected\u003c/li\u003e\u003c/ul\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\u003cb\u003eMitigation\u003c/b\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eUsers of affected versions should upgrade to the corresponding fixed version.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\u003ctable\u003e\u003ctbody\u003e\u003ctr\u003e\u003ctd\u003eAffected version(s)\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd\u003eFix Version\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd\u003eAvailability\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e\u003c/tr\u003e\u003ctr\u003e\u003ctd\u003e6.2.x\u003cbr\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd\u003e 6.2.7\u003cbr\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd\u003eOSS\u003c/td\u003e\u003c/tr\u003e\u003ctr\u003e\u003ctd\u003e6.1.x\u003cbr\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd\u003e 6.1.20\u003cbr\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd\u003eOSS\u003c/td\u003e\u003c/tr\u003e\u003ctr\u003e\u003ctd\u003e6.0.x\u003cbr\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd\u003e 6.0.28\u003cbr\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd\u003e\u003ca target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow\" href=\"https://enterprise.spring.io/\"\u003eCommercial\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003c/tr\u003e\u003ctr\u003e\u003ctd\u003e5.3.x\u003cbr\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd\u003e 5.3.43\u003cbr\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd\u003e\u003ca target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow\" href=\"https://enterprise.spring.io/\"\u003eCommercial\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003c/tr\u003e\u003c/tbody\u003e\u003c/table\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\u003cspan style=\"background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255);\"\u003eNo further mitigation steps are necessary.\u003c/span\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eGenerally, we recommend using a dedicated model object with properties only for data binding, or using constructor binding since constructor arguments explicitly declare what to bind together with turning off setter binding through the declarativeBinding flag. See the Model Design section in the reference documentation.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eFor setting binding, prefer the use of allowedFields (an explicit list) over disallowedFields.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eCredit\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eThis issue was responsibly reported by the TERASOLUNA Framework Development Team from NTT DATA Group Corporation.\u003cbr\u003e"
            }
          ],
          "value": "CVE-2024-38820 ensured Locale-independent, lowercase conversion for both the configured disallowedFields patterns and for request parameter names. However, there are still cases where it is possible to bypass the disallowedFields checks.\n\nAffected Spring Products and Versions\n\nSpring Framework:\n  *  6.2.0 - 6.2.6\n\n  *  6.1.0 - 6.1.19\n\n  *  6.0.0 - 6.0.27\n\n  *  5.3.0 - 5.3.42\n  *  Older, unsupported versions are also affected\n\n\n\nMitigation\n\nUsers of affected versions should upgrade to the corresponding fixed version.\n\nAffected version(s)Fix Version\u00a0Availability\u00a06.2.x\n 6.2.7\nOSS6.1.x\n 6.1.20\nOSS6.0.x\n 6.0.28\n Commercial https://enterprise.spring.io/ 5.3.x\n 5.3.43\n Commercial https://enterprise.spring.io/ \nNo further mitigation steps are necessary.\n\n\nGenerally, we recommend using a dedicated model object with properties only for data binding, or using constructor binding since constructor arguments explicitly declare what to bind together with turning off setter binding through the declarativeBinding flag. See the Model Design section in the reference documentation.\n\nFor setting binding, prefer the use of allowedFields (an explicit list) over disallowedFields.\n\nCredit\n\nThis issue was responsibly reported by the TERASOLUNA Framework Development Team from NTT DATA Group Corporation."
        }
      ],
      "impacts": [
        {
          "capecId": "CAPEC-137",
          "descriptions": [
            {
              "lang": "en",
              "value": "CAPEC-137: Parameter Injection"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "metrics": [
        {
          "cvssV3_1": {
            "attackComplexity": "HIGH",
            "attackVector": "NETWORK",
            "availabilityImpact": "NONE",
            "baseScore": 3.1,
            "baseSeverity": "LOW",
            "confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
            "integrityImpact": "LOW",
            "privilegesRequired": "LOW",
            "scope": "UNCHANGED",
            "userInteraction": "NONE",
            "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N",
            "version": "3.1"
          },
          "format": "CVSS",
          "scenarios": [
            {
              "lang": "en",
              "value": "GENERAL"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "problemTypes": [
        {
          "descriptions": [
            {
              "cweId": "CWE-20",
              "description": "CWE-20 Improper Input Validation",
              "lang": "en",
              "type": "CWE"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "providerMetadata": {
        "dateUpdated": "2025-05-16T19:14:07.500Z",
        "orgId": "dcf2e128-44bd-42ed-91e8-88f912c1401d",
        "shortName": "vmware"
      },
      "references": [
        {
          "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln-metrics/cvss/v3-calculator?vector=AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N\u0026version=3.1"
        }
      ],
      "source": {
        "discovery": "UNKNOWN"
      },
      "title": "Spring Framework DataBinder Case Sensitive Match Exception",
      "x_generator": {
        "engine": "Vulnogram 0.2.0"
      }
    }
  },
  "cveMetadata": {
    "assignerOrgId": "dcf2e128-44bd-42ed-91e8-88f912c1401d",
    "assignerShortName": "vmware",
    "cveId": "CVE-2025-22233",
    "datePublished": "2025-05-16T19:14:07.500Z",
    "dateReserved": "2025-01-02T04:29:59.191Z",
    "dateUpdated": "2025-05-17T02:37:03.191Z",
    "state": "PUBLISHED"
  },
  "dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
  "dataVersion": "5.1",
  "vulnerability-lookup:meta": {
    "vulnrichment": {
      "containers": "{\"adp\": [{\"title\": \"CISA ADP Vulnrichment\", \"metrics\": [{\"other\": {\"type\": \"ssvc\", \"content\": {\"id\": \"CVE-2025-22233\", \"role\": \"CISA Coordinator\", \"options\": [{\"Exploitation\": \"none\"}, {\"Automatable\": \"no\"}, {\"Technical Impact\": \"partial\"}], \"version\": \"2.0.3\", \"timestamp\": \"2025-05-17T02:36:53.736871Z\"}}}], \"providerMetadata\": {\"orgId\": \"134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0\", \"shortName\": \"CISA-ADP\", \"dateUpdated\": \"2025-05-17T02:36:58.506Z\"}}], \"cna\": {\"title\": \"Spring Framework DataBinder Case Sensitive Match Exception\", \"source\": {\"discovery\": \"UNKNOWN\"}, \"impacts\": [{\"capecId\": \"CAPEC-137\", \"descriptions\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"value\": \"CAPEC-137: Parameter Injection\"}]}], \"metrics\": [{\"format\": \"CVSS\", \"cvssV3_1\": {\"scope\": \"UNCHANGED\", \"version\": \"3.1\", \"baseScore\": 3.1, \"attackVector\": \"NETWORK\", \"baseSeverity\": \"LOW\", \"vectorString\": \"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N\", \"integrityImpact\": \"LOW\", \"userInteraction\": \"NONE\", \"attackComplexity\": \"HIGH\", \"availabilityImpact\": \"NONE\", \"privilegesRequired\": \"LOW\", \"confidentialityImpact\": \"NONE\"}, \"scenarios\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"value\": \"GENERAL\"}]}], \"affected\": [{\"vendor\": \"Spring\", \"product\": \"Spring Framework\", \"versions\": [{\"status\": \"affected\", \"version\": \"6.2.0\", \"versionType\": \"Framework\", \"lessThanOrEqual\": \"6.2.6\"}, {\"status\": \"affected\", \"version\": \"6.1.0\", \"versionType\": \"Framework\", \"lessThanOrEqual\": \"6.1.19\"}, {\"status\": \"affected\", \"version\": \"6.0.0\", \"versionType\": \"Enterprise Framework\", \"lessThanOrEqual\": \"6.0.27\"}, {\"status\": \"affected\", \"version\": \"5.3.0\", \"versionType\": \"Enterprise Framework\", \"lessThanOrEqual\": \"5.3.42\"}, {\"status\": \"unaffected\", \"version\": \"6.2.7\", \"versionType\": \"Framework\"}, {\"status\": \"unaffected\", \"version\": \"6.1.20\", \"versionType\": \"Framework\"}, {\"status\": \"unaffected\", \"version\": \"6.0.28\", \"versionType\": \"Enterprise Framework\"}, {\"status\": \"unaffected\", \"version\": \"5.3.43\", \"versionType\": \"Entrprise Framework\"}], \"defaultStatus\": \"affected\"}], \"datePublic\": \"2025-05-15T15:02:00.000Z\", \"references\": [{\"url\": \"https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln-metrics/cvss/v3-calculator?vector=AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N\u0026version=3.1\"}], \"x_generator\": {\"engine\": \"Vulnogram 0.2.0\"}, \"descriptions\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"value\": \"CVE-2024-38820 ensured Locale-independent, lowercase conversion for both the configured disallowedFields patterns and for request parameter names. However, there are still cases where it is possible to bypass the disallowedFields checks.\\n\\nAffected Spring Products and Versions\\n\\nSpring Framework:\\n  *  6.2.0 - 6.2.6\\n\\n  *  6.1.0 - 6.1.19\\n\\n  *  6.0.0 - 6.0.27\\n\\n  *  5.3.0 - 5.3.42\\n  *  Older, unsupported versions are also affected\\n\\n\\n\\nMitigation\\n\\nUsers of affected versions should upgrade to the corresponding fixed version.\\n\\nAffected version(s)Fix Version\\u00a0Availability\\u00a06.2.x\\n 6.2.7\\nOSS6.1.x\\n 6.1.20\\nOSS6.0.x\\n 6.0.28\\n Commercial https://enterprise.spring.io/ 5.3.x\\n 5.3.43\\n Commercial https://enterprise.spring.io/ \\nNo further mitigation steps are necessary.\\n\\n\\nGenerally, we recommend using a dedicated model object with properties only for data binding, or using constructor binding since constructor arguments explicitly declare what to bind together with turning off setter binding through the declarativeBinding flag. See the Model Design section in the reference documentation.\\n\\nFor setting binding, prefer the use of allowedFields (an explicit list) over disallowedFields.\\n\\nCredit\\n\\nThis issue was responsibly reported by the TERASOLUNA Framework Development Team from NTT DATA Group Corporation.\", \"supportingMedia\": [{\"type\": \"text/html\", \"value\": \"CVE-2024-38820 ensured Locale-independent, lowercase conversion for both the configured disallowedFields patterns and for request parameter names. However, there are still cases where it is possible to bypass the disallowedFields checks.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\u003cb\u003eAffected Spring Products and Versions\u003c/b\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eSpring Framework:\u003cbr\u003e\u003cul\u003e\u003cli\u003e6.2.0 - 6.2.6\u003cbr\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e6.1.0 - 6.1.19\u003cbr\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e6.0.0 - 6.0.27\u003cbr\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e5.3.0 - 5.3.42\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003eOlder, unsupported versions are also affected\u003c/li\u003e\u003c/ul\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\u003cb\u003eMitigation\u003c/b\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eUsers of affected versions should upgrade to the corresponding fixed version.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\u003ctable\u003e\u003ctbody\u003e\u003ctr\u003e\u003ctd\u003eAffected version(s)\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd\u003eFix Version\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd\u003eAvailability\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e\u003c/tr\u003e\u003ctr\u003e\u003ctd\u003e6.2.x\u003cbr\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd\u003e 6.2.7\u003cbr\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd\u003eOSS\u003c/td\u003e\u003c/tr\u003e\u003ctr\u003e\u003ctd\u003e6.1.x\u003cbr\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd\u003e 6.1.20\u003cbr\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd\u003eOSS\u003c/td\u003e\u003c/tr\u003e\u003ctr\u003e\u003ctd\u003e6.0.x\u003cbr\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd\u003e 6.0.28\u003cbr\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd\u003e\u003ca target=\\\"_blank\\\" rel=\\\"nofollow\\\" href=\\\"https://enterprise.spring.io/\\\"\u003eCommercial\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003c/tr\u003e\u003ctr\u003e\u003ctd\u003e5.3.x\u003cbr\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd\u003e 5.3.43\u003cbr\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd\u003e\u003ca target=\\\"_blank\\\" rel=\\\"nofollow\\\" href=\\\"https://enterprise.spring.io/\\\"\u003eCommercial\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003c/tr\u003e\u003c/tbody\u003e\u003c/table\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\u003cspan style=\\\"background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255);\\\"\u003eNo further mitigation steps are necessary.\u003c/span\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eGenerally, we recommend using a dedicated model object with properties only for data binding, or using constructor binding since constructor arguments explicitly declare what to bind together with turning off setter binding through the declarativeBinding flag. See the Model Design section in the reference documentation.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eFor setting binding, prefer the use of allowedFields (an explicit list) over disallowedFields.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eCredit\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eThis issue was responsibly reported by the TERASOLUNA Framework Development Team from NTT DATA Group Corporation.\u003cbr\u003e\", \"base64\": false}]}], \"problemTypes\": [{\"descriptions\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"type\": \"CWE\", \"cweId\": \"CWE-20\", \"description\": \"CWE-20 Improper Input Validation\"}]}], \"providerMetadata\": {\"orgId\": \"dcf2e128-44bd-42ed-91e8-88f912c1401d\", \"shortName\": \"vmware\", \"dateUpdated\": \"2025-05-16T19:14:07.500Z\"}}}",
      "cveMetadata": "{\"cveId\": \"CVE-2025-22233\", \"state\": \"PUBLISHED\", \"dateUpdated\": \"2025-05-17T02:37:03.191Z\", \"dateReserved\": \"2025-01-02T04:29:59.191Z\", \"assignerOrgId\": \"dcf2e128-44bd-42ed-91e8-88f912c1401d\", \"datePublished\": \"2025-05-16T19:14:07.500Z\", \"assignerShortName\": \"vmware\"}",
      "dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
      "dataVersion": "5.1"
    }
  }
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.


Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…