CVE-2025-54572 (GCVE-0-2025-54572)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2025-07-30 14:05 – Updated: 2025-11-03 18:13
VLAI?
Title
Ruby SAML DOS vulnerability with large SAML response
Summary
The Ruby SAML library is for implementing the client side of a SAML authorization. In versions 1.18.0 and below, a denial-of-service vulnerability exists in ruby-saml even with the message_max_bytesize setting configured. The vulnerability occurs because the SAML response is validated for Base64 format prior to checking the message size, leading to potential resource exhaustion. This is fixed in version 1.18.1.
Severity ?
CWE
Assigner
References
| URL | Tags | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
||||||||||||||
Impacted products
| Vendor | Product | Version | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SAML-Toolkits | ruby-saml |
Affected:
< 1.18.1
|
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2025-54572",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "yes"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2025-07-30T14:17:38.090804Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-07-30T14:17:41.057Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
},
{
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-11-03T18:13:37.284Z",
"orgId": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"shortName": "CVE"
},
"references": [
{
"url": "https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2025/09/msg00001.html"
}
],
"title": "CVE Program Container"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"product": "ruby-saml",
"vendor": "SAML-Toolkits",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "\u003c 1.18.1"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "The Ruby SAML library is for implementing the client side of a SAML authorization. In versions 1.18.0 and below, a denial-of-service vulnerability exists in ruby-saml even with the message_max_bytesize setting configured. The vulnerability occurs because the SAML response is validated for Base64 format prior to checking the message size, leading to potential resource exhaustion. This is fixed in version 1.18.1."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV4_0": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackRequirements": "NONE",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"baseScore": 6.9,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"subAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
"subConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"subIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N",
"version": "4.0",
"vulnAvailabilityImpact": "LOW",
"vulnConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"vulnIntegrityImpact": "NONE"
}
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-400",
"description": "CWE-400: Uncontrolled Resource Consumption",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
},
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-770",
"description": "CWE-770: Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-07-30T14:05:43.820Z",
"orgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"shortName": "GitHub_M"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "https://github.com/SAML-Toolkits/ruby-saml/security/advisories/GHSA-rrqh-93c8-j966",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_CONFIRM"
],
"url": "https://github.com/SAML-Toolkits/ruby-saml/security/advisories/GHSA-rrqh-93c8-j966"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/SAML-Toolkits/ruby-saml/pull/770",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://github.com/SAML-Toolkits/ruby-saml/pull/770"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/SAML-Toolkits/ruby-saml/commit/38ef5dd1ce17514e202431f569c4f5633e6c2709",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://github.com/SAML-Toolkits/ruby-saml/commit/38ef5dd1ce17514e202431f569c4f5633e6c2709"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/SAML-Toolkits/ruby-saml/releases/tag/v1.18.1",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://github.com/SAML-Toolkits/ruby-saml/releases/tag/v1.18.1"
}
],
"source": {
"advisory": "GHSA-rrqh-93c8-j966",
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"title": "Ruby SAML DOS vulnerability with large SAML response"
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"assignerShortName": "GitHub_M",
"cveId": "CVE-2025-54572",
"datePublished": "2025-07-30T14:05:43.820Z",
"dateReserved": "2025-07-25T16:19:16.091Z",
"dateUpdated": "2025-11-03T18:13:37.284Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2",
"vulnerability-lookup:meta": {
"vulnrichment": {
"containers": "{\"cna\": {\"title\": \"Ruby SAML DOS vulnerability with large SAML response\", \"problemTypes\": [{\"descriptions\": [{\"cweId\": \"CWE-400\", \"lang\": \"en\", \"description\": \"CWE-400: Uncontrolled Resource Consumption\", \"type\": \"CWE\"}]}, {\"descriptions\": [{\"cweId\": \"CWE-770\", \"lang\": \"en\", \"description\": \"CWE-770: Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling\", \"type\": \"CWE\"}]}], \"metrics\": [{\"cvssV4_0\": {\"attackVector\": \"NETWORK\", \"attackComplexity\": \"LOW\", \"attackRequirements\": \"NONE\", \"privilegesRequired\": \"NONE\", \"userInteraction\": \"NONE\", \"vulnConfidentialityImpact\": \"NONE\", \"vulnIntegrityImpact\": \"NONE\", \"vulnAvailabilityImpact\": \"LOW\", \"subConfidentialityImpact\": \"NONE\", \"subIntegrityImpact\": \"NONE\", \"subAvailabilityImpact\": \"NONE\", \"baseScore\": 6.9, \"baseSeverity\": \"MEDIUM\", \"vectorString\": \"CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N\", \"version\": \"4.0\"}}], \"references\": [{\"name\": \"https://github.com/SAML-Toolkits/ruby-saml/security/advisories/GHSA-rrqh-93c8-j966\", \"tags\": [\"x_refsource_CONFIRM\"], \"url\": \"https://github.com/SAML-Toolkits/ruby-saml/security/advisories/GHSA-rrqh-93c8-j966\"}, {\"name\": \"https://github.com/SAML-Toolkits/ruby-saml/pull/770\", \"tags\": [\"x_refsource_MISC\"], \"url\": \"https://github.com/SAML-Toolkits/ruby-saml/pull/770\"}, {\"name\": \"https://github.com/SAML-Toolkits/ruby-saml/commit/38ef5dd1ce17514e202431f569c4f5633e6c2709\", \"tags\": [\"x_refsource_MISC\"], \"url\": \"https://github.com/SAML-Toolkits/ruby-saml/commit/38ef5dd1ce17514e202431f569c4f5633e6c2709\"}, {\"name\": \"https://github.com/SAML-Toolkits/ruby-saml/releases/tag/v1.18.1\", \"tags\": [\"x_refsource_MISC\"], \"url\": \"https://github.com/SAML-Toolkits/ruby-saml/releases/tag/v1.18.1\"}], \"affected\": [{\"vendor\": \"SAML-Toolkits\", \"product\": \"ruby-saml\", \"versions\": [{\"version\": \"\u003c 1.18.1\", \"status\": \"affected\"}]}], \"providerMetadata\": {\"orgId\": \"a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa\", \"shortName\": \"GitHub_M\", \"dateUpdated\": \"2025-07-30T14:05:43.820Z\"}, \"descriptions\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"value\": \"The Ruby SAML library is for implementing the client side of a SAML authorization. In versions 1.18.0 and below, a denial-of-service vulnerability exists in ruby-saml even with the message_max_bytesize setting configured. The vulnerability occurs because the SAML response is validated for Base64 format prior to checking the message size, leading to potential resource exhaustion. This is fixed in version 1.18.1.\"}], \"source\": {\"advisory\": \"GHSA-rrqh-93c8-j966\", \"discovery\": \"UNKNOWN\"}}, \"adp\": [{\"title\": \"CISA ADP Vulnrichment\", \"metrics\": [{\"other\": {\"type\": \"ssvc\", \"content\": {\"id\": \"CVE-2025-54572\", \"role\": \"CISA Coordinator\", \"options\": [{\"Exploitation\": \"none\"}, {\"Automatable\": \"yes\"}, {\"Technical Impact\": \"partial\"}], \"version\": \"2.0.3\", \"timestamp\": \"2025-07-30T14:17:38.090804Z\"}}}], \"providerMetadata\": {\"orgId\": \"134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0\", \"shortName\": \"CISA-ADP\", \"dateUpdated\": \"2025-07-30T14:17:33.379Z\"}}]}",
"cveMetadata": "{\"cveId\": \"CVE-2025-54572\", \"assignerOrgId\": \"a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa\", \"state\": \"PUBLISHED\", \"assignerShortName\": \"GitHub_M\", \"dateReserved\": \"2025-07-25T16:19:16.091Z\", \"datePublished\": \"2025-07-30T14:05:43.820Z\", \"dateUpdated\": \"2025-07-30T14:17:41.057Z\"}",
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.1"
}
}
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…