FKIE_CVE-2010-2972

Vulnerability from fkie_nvd - Published: 2010-08-05 18:17 - Updated: 2023-11-07 02:05
Severity ?
Summary
Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2010-1797. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2010-1797. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2010-1797 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage
References
Impacted products
Vendor Product Version
To clipboard 

{
  "cveTags": [],
  "descriptions": [
    {
      "lang": "en",
      "value": "Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER.  ConsultIDs: CVE-2010-1797.  Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2010-1797.  Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2010-1797 instead of this candidate.  All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage"
    }
  ],
  "evaluatorImpact": "Per: http://xforce.iss.net/xforce/xfdb/60856\r\n\r\n\u0027Platforms Affected:\r\n\r\n    * Apple iPhone OS 4.0 iPodtouch\r\n    * Apple iPhone OS 4.0\r\n    * Apple iPhone OS 4.0.1 iPodtouch\r\n    * Apple iPhone OS 4.0.1 \u0027\r\n\r\n\r\nPer: http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/42151/discuss\r\n\r\n\u0027versions 4.0.1 and prior are vulnerable.\u0027\r\n",
  "id": "CVE-2010-2972",
  "lastModified": "2023-11-07T02:05:46.120",
  "metrics": {},
  "published": "2010-08-05T18:17:58.167",
  "references": [],
  "sourceIdentifier": "cve@mitre.org",
  "vulnStatus": "Rejected"
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.




Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.



Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.