FKIE_CVE-2023-52632
Vulnerability from fkie_nvd - Published: 2024-04-02 07:15 - Updated: 2025-03-17 15:17
Severity ?
Summary
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
drm/amdkfd: Fix lock dependency warning with srcu
======================================================
WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
6.5.0-kfd-yangp #2289 Not tainted
------------------------------------------------------
kworker/0:2/996 is trying to acquire lock:
(srcu){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: __synchronize_srcu+0x5/0x1a0
but task is already holding lock:
((work_completion)(&svms->deferred_list_work)){+.+.}-{0:0}, at:
process_one_work+0x211/0x560
which lock already depends on the new lock.
the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:
-> #3 ((work_completion)(&svms->deferred_list_work)){+.+.}-{0:0}:
__flush_work+0x88/0x4f0
svm_range_list_lock_and_flush_work+0x3d/0x110 [amdgpu]
svm_range_set_attr+0xd6/0x14c0 [amdgpu]
kfd_ioctl+0x1d1/0x630 [amdgpu]
__x64_sys_ioctl+0x88/0xc0
-> #2 (&info->lock#2){+.+.}-{3:3}:
__mutex_lock+0x99/0xc70
amdgpu_amdkfd_gpuvm_restore_process_bos+0x54/0x740 [amdgpu]
restore_process_helper+0x22/0x80 [amdgpu]
restore_process_worker+0x2d/0xa0 [amdgpu]
process_one_work+0x29b/0x560
worker_thread+0x3d/0x3d0
-> #1 ((work_completion)(&(&process->restore_work)->work)){+.+.}-{0:0}:
__flush_work+0x88/0x4f0
__cancel_work_timer+0x12c/0x1c0
kfd_process_notifier_release_internal+0x37/0x1f0 [amdgpu]
__mmu_notifier_release+0xad/0x240
exit_mmap+0x6a/0x3a0
mmput+0x6a/0x120
do_exit+0x322/0xb90
do_group_exit+0x37/0xa0
__x64_sys_exit_group+0x18/0x20
do_syscall_64+0x38/0x80
-> #0 (srcu){.+.+}-{0:0}:
__lock_acquire+0x1521/0x2510
lock_sync+0x5f/0x90
__synchronize_srcu+0x4f/0x1a0
__mmu_notifier_release+0x128/0x240
exit_mmap+0x6a/0x3a0
mmput+0x6a/0x120
svm_range_deferred_list_work+0x19f/0x350 [amdgpu]
process_one_work+0x29b/0x560
worker_thread+0x3d/0x3d0
other info that might help us debug this:
Chain exists of:
srcu --> &info->lock#2 --> (work_completion)(&svms->deferred_list_work)
Possible unsafe locking scenario:
CPU0 CPU1
---- ----
lock((work_completion)(&svms->deferred_list_work));
lock(&info->lock#2);
lock((work_completion)(&svms->deferred_list_work));
sync(srcu);
References
Impacted products
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| linux | linux_kernel | * | |
| linux | linux_kernel | * | |
| linux | linux_kernel | * |
{
"configurations": [
{
"nodes": [
{
"cpeMatch": [
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "F749AC21-58DA-44BE-B3C5-7C53F294A67A",
"versionEndExcluding": "6.1.77",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "A5007D6A-4B58-423A-8A3A-A1A656A263C8",
"versionEndExcluding": "6.6.16",
"versionStartIncluding": "6.2",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "848BC44C-9D25-4557-A50A-4B8BF310FA78",
"versionEndExcluding": "6.7.4",
"versionStartIncluding": "6.7",
"vulnerable": true
}
],
"negate": false,
"operator": "OR"
}
]
}
],
"cveTags": [],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\ndrm/amdkfd: Fix lock dependency warning with srcu\n\n======================================================\nWARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected\n6.5.0-kfd-yangp #2289 Not tainted\n------------------------------------------------------\nkworker/0:2/996 is trying to acquire lock:\n (srcu){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: __synchronize_srcu+0x5/0x1a0\n\nbut task is already holding lock:\n ((work_completion)(\u0026svms-\u003edeferred_list_work)){+.+.}-{0:0}, at:\n\tprocess_one_work+0x211/0x560\n\nwhich lock already depends on the new lock.\n\nthe existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:\n\n-\u003e #3 ((work_completion)(\u0026svms-\u003edeferred_list_work)){+.+.}-{0:0}:\n __flush_work+0x88/0x4f0\n svm_range_list_lock_and_flush_work+0x3d/0x110 [amdgpu]\n svm_range_set_attr+0xd6/0x14c0 [amdgpu]\n kfd_ioctl+0x1d1/0x630 [amdgpu]\n __x64_sys_ioctl+0x88/0xc0\n\n-\u003e #2 (\u0026info-\u003elock#2){+.+.}-{3:3}:\n __mutex_lock+0x99/0xc70\n amdgpu_amdkfd_gpuvm_restore_process_bos+0x54/0x740 [amdgpu]\n restore_process_helper+0x22/0x80 [amdgpu]\n restore_process_worker+0x2d/0xa0 [amdgpu]\n process_one_work+0x29b/0x560\n worker_thread+0x3d/0x3d0\n\n-\u003e #1 ((work_completion)(\u0026(\u0026process-\u003erestore_work)-\u003ework)){+.+.}-{0:0}:\n __flush_work+0x88/0x4f0\n __cancel_work_timer+0x12c/0x1c0\n kfd_process_notifier_release_internal+0x37/0x1f0 [amdgpu]\n __mmu_notifier_release+0xad/0x240\n exit_mmap+0x6a/0x3a0\n mmput+0x6a/0x120\n do_exit+0x322/0xb90\n do_group_exit+0x37/0xa0\n __x64_sys_exit_group+0x18/0x20\n do_syscall_64+0x38/0x80\n\n-\u003e #0 (srcu){.+.+}-{0:0}:\n __lock_acquire+0x1521/0x2510\n lock_sync+0x5f/0x90\n __synchronize_srcu+0x4f/0x1a0\n __mmu_notifier_release+0x128/0x240\n exit_mmap+0x6a/0x3a0\n mmput+0x6a/0x120\n svm_range_deferred_list_work+0x19f/0x350 [amdgpu]\n process_one_work+0x29b/0x560\n worker_thread+0x3d/0x3d0\n\nother info that might help us debug this:\nChain exists of:\n srcu --\u003e \u0026info-\u003elock#2 --\u003e (work_completion)(\u0026svms-\u003edeferred_list_work)\n\nPossible unsafe locking scenario:\n\n CPU0 CPU1\n ---- ----\n lock((work_completion)(\u0026svms-\u003edeferred_list_work));\n lock(\u0026info-\u003elock#2);\n\t\t\tlock((work_completion)(\u0026svms-\u003edeferred_list_work));\n sync(srcu);"
},
{
"lang": "es",
"value": "En el kernel de Linux, se ha resuelto la siguiente vulnerabilidad: drm/amdkfd: corrige la advertencia de dependencia de bloqueo con srcu ============================== ========================== ADVERTENCIA: posible dependencia de bloqueo circular detectada 6.5.0-kfd-yangp #2289 No contaminado ------ ------------------------------------------------ ktrabajador/ 0:2/996 est\u00e1 intentando adquirir el bloqueo: (srcu){.+.+}-{0:0}, en: __synchronize_srcu+0x5/0x1a0 pero la tarea ya mantiene el bloqueo: ((work_completion)(\u0026amp;svms-\u0026gt;deferred_list_work )){+.+.}-{0:0}, en: Process_one_work+0x211/0x560 cuyo bloqueo ya depende del nuevo bloqueo. la cadena de dependencia existente (en orden inverso) es: -\u0026gt; #3 ((work_completion)(\u0026amp;svms-\u0026gt;deferred_list_work)){+.+.}-{0:0}: __flush_work+0x88/0x4f0 svm_range_list_lock_and_flush_work+0x3d/0x110 [ amdgpu] svm_range_set_attr+0xd6/0x14c0 [amdgpu] kfd_ioctl+0x1d1/0x630 [amdgpu] __x64_sys_ioctl+0x88/0xc0 -\u0026gt; #2 (\u0026amp;info-\u0026gt;lock#2){+.+.}-{3:3}: __mutex_lock+ 0x99/0xc70 amdgpu_amdkfd_gpuvm_restore_process_bos+0x54/0x740 [amdgpu] restaurar_proceso_helper+0x22/0x80 [amdgpu] restaurar_proceso_trabajador+0x2d/0xa0 [amdgpu] proceso_one_work+0x29b/0x560 trabajador_thread+0x3d/0x3d 0 -\u0026gt; #1 ((finalizaci\u00f3n_trabajo)(\u0026amp;(\u0026amp;proceso- \u0026gt;restore_work)-\u0026gt;work)){+.+.}-{0:0}: __flush_work+0x88/0x4f0 __cancel_work_timer+0x12c/0x1c0 kfd_process_notifier_release_internal+0x37/0x1f0 [amdgpu] __mmu_notifier_release+0xad/0x240 exit_mmap+0x6a/0x3 a0 mmentrada +0x6a/0x120 do_exit+0x322/0xb90 do_group_exit+0x37/0xa0 __x64_sys_exit_group+0x18/0x20 do_syscall_64+0x38/0x80 -\u0026gt; #0 (srcu){.+.+}-{0:0}: __lock_acquire+0x1521/0x2 510 lock_sync +0x5f/0x90 __synchronize_srcu+0x4f/0x1a0 __mmu_notifier_release+0x128/0x240 exit_mmap+0x6a/0x3a0 mmput+0x6a/0x120 svm_range_deferred_list_work+0x19f/0x350 [amdgpu] Process_one_work+0x29b/0 x560 trabajador_thread+0x3d/0x3d0 otra informaci\u00f3n que podr\u00eda ayudarnos a depurar esto : Existe cadena de: srcu --\u0026gt; \u0026amp;info-\u0026gt;lock#2 --\u0026gt; (work_completion)(\u0026amp;svms-\u0026gt;deferred_list_work) Posible escenario de bloqueo inseguro: CPU0 CPU1 ---- ---- lock((work_completion)(\u0026amp;svms- \u0026gt;lista_trabajo_diferido)); bloquear(\u0026amp;info-\u0026gt;bloquear#2); lock((work_completion)(\u0026amp;svms-\u0026gt;deferred_list_work)); sincronizaci\u00f3n(srcu);"
}
],
"id": "CVE-2023-52632",
"lastModified": "2025-03-17T15:17:57.207",
"metrics": {
"cvssMetricV31": [
{
"cvssData": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "LOCAL",
"availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"baseScore": 5.5,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"integrityImpact": "NONE",
"privilegesRequired": "LOW",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
"version": "3.1"
},
"exploitabilityScore": 1.8,
"impactScore": 3.6,
"source": "nvd@nist.gov",
"type": "Primary"
}
]
},
"published": "2024-04-02T07:15:41.010",
"references": [
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/1556c242e64cdffe58736aa650b0b395854fe4d4"
},
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/2a9de42e8d3c82c6990d226198602be44f43f340"
},
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/752312f6a79440086ac0f9b08d7776870037323c"
},
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/b602f098f716723fa5c6c96a486e0afba83b7b94"
},
{
"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/1556c242e64cdffe58736aa650b0b395854fe4d4"
},
{
"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/2a9de42e8d3c82c6990d226198602be44f43f340"
},
{
"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/752312f6a79440086ac0f9b08d7776870037323c"
},
{
"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/b602f098f716723fa5c6c96a486e0afba83b7b94"
}
],
"sourceIdentifier": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"vulnStatus": "Analyzed",
"weaknesses": [
{
"description": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CWE-667"
}
],
"source": "nvd@nist.gov",
"type": "Primary"
}
]
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…