FKIE_CVE-2023-53618
Vulnerability from fkie_nvd - Published: 2025-10-07 16:15 - Updated: 2026-02-05 14:58
Severity ?
Summary
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
btrfs: reject invalid reloc tree root keys with stack dump
[BUG]
Syzbot reported a crash that an ASSERT() got triggered inside
prepare_to_merge().
That ASSERT() makes sure the reloc tree is properly pointed back by its
subvolume tree.
[CAUSE]
After more debugging output, it turns out we had an invalid reloc tree:
BTRFS error (device loop1): reloc tree mismatch, root 8 has no reloc root, expect reloc root key (-8, 132, 8) gen 17
Note the above root key is (TREE_RELOC_OBJECTID, ROOT_ITEM,
QUOTA_TREE_OBJECTID), meaning it's a reloc tree for quota tree.
But reloc trees can only exist for subvolumes, as for non-subvolume
trees, we just COW the involved tree block, no need to create a reloc
tree since those tree blocks won't be shared with other trees.
Only subvolumes tree can share tree blocks with other trees (thus they
have BTRFS_ROOT_SHAREABLE flag).
Thus this new debug output proves my previous assumption that corrupted
on-disk data can trigger that ASSERT().
[FIX]
Besides the dedicated fix and the graceful exit, also let tree-checker to
check such root keys, to make sure reloc trees can only exist for subvolumes.
References
Impacted products
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| linux | linux_kernel | * | |
| linux | linux_kernel | * | |
| linux | linux_kernel | * | |
| linux | linux_kernel | * | |
| linux | linux_kernel | 6.5 | |
| linux | linux_kernel | 6.5 | |
| linux | linux_kernel | 6.5 | |
| linux | linux_kernel | 6.5 | |
| linux | linux_kernel | 6.5 |
{
"configurations": [
{
"nodes": [
{
"cpeMatch": [
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "48875F15-B129-4684-8556-4EAD32A9586F",
"versionEndExcluding": "5.3",
"versionStartIncluding": "5.2.19",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "96E6BF19-FB03-4C7D-B953-056D6BAD2410",
"versionEndExcluding": "5.15.127",
"versionStartIncluding": "5.3.4",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "D8B8CC90-9492-465C-81D4-10DA3B712286",
"versionEndExcluding": "6.1.46",
"versionStartIncluding": "5.16",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "C36FD9E6-B6D7-4887-8F08-C1F64E139D5C",
"versionEndExcluding": "6.4.11",
"versionStartIncluding": "6.2",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:6.5:rc1:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "0B3E6E4D-E24E-4630-B00C-8C9901C597B0",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:6.5:rc2:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "E4A01A71-0F09-4DB2-A02F-7EFFBE27C98D",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:6.5:rc3:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "F5608371-157A-4318-8A2E-4104C3467EA1",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:6.5:rc4:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "2226A776-DF8C-49E0-A030-0A7853BB018A",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:6.5:rc5:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "6F15C659-DF06-455A-9765-0E6DE920F29A",
"vulnerable": true
}
],
"negate": false,
"operator": "OR"
}
]
}
],
"cveTags": [],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nbtrfs: reject invalid reloc tree root keys with stack dump\n\n[BUG]\nSyzbot reported a crash that an ASSERT() got triggered inside\nprepare_to_merge().\n\nThat ASSERT() makes sure the reloc tree is properly pointed back by its\nsubvolume tree.\n\n[CAUSE]\nAfter more debugging output, it turns out we had an invalid reloc tree:\n\n BTRFS error (device loop1): reloc tree mismatch, root 8 has no reloc root, expect reloc root key (-8, 132, 8) gen 17\n\nNote the above root key is (TREE_RELOC_OBJECTID, ROOT_ITEM,\nQUOTA_TREE_OBJECTID), meaning it\u0027s a reloc tree for quota tree.\n\nBut reloc trees can only exist for subvolumes, as for non-subvolume\ntrees, we just COW the involved tree block, no need to create a reloc\ntree since those tree blocks won\u0027t be shared with other trees.\n\nOnly subvolumes tree can share tree blocks with other trees (thus they\nhave BTRFS_ROOT_SHAREABLE flag).\n\nThus this new debug output proves my previous assumption that corrupted\non-disk data can trigger that ASSERT().\n\n[FIX]\nBesides the dedicated fix and the graceful exit, also let tree-checker to\ncheck such root keys, to make sure reloc trees can only exist for subvolumes."
}
],
"id": "CVE-2023-53618",
"lastModified": "2026-02-05T14:58:43.870",
"metrics": {
"cvssMetricV31": [
{
"cvssData": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "LOCAL",
"availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"baseScore": 5.5,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"integrityImpact": "NONE",
"privilegesRequired": "LOW",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
"version": "3.1"
},
"exploitabilityScore": 1.8,
"impactScore": 3.6,
"source": "nvd@nist.gov",
"type": "Primary"
}
]
},
"published": "2025-10-07T16:15:44.297",
"references": [
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/314135b7bae9618a317874ae195272682cf2d5d4"
},
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/3ae93b316ca4b8b3c33798ef1d210355f2fb9318"
},
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/6ebcd021c92b8e4b904552e4d87283032100796d"
},
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/84256e00eeca73c529fc6196e478cc89b8098157"
}
],
"sourceIdentifier": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"vulnStatus": "Analyzed",
"weaknesses": [
{
"description": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "NVD-CWE-noinfo"
}
],
"source": "nvd@nist.gov",
"type": "Primary"
}
]
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…