FKIE_CVE-2024-45000
Vulnerability from fkie_nvd - Published: 2024-09-04 20:15 - Updated: 2025-11-03 23:15
Severity ?
Summary
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
fs/netfs/fscache_cookie: add missing "n_accesses" check
This fixes a NULL pointer dereference bug due to a data race which
looks like this:
BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 0000000000000008
#PF: supervisor read access in kernel mode
#PF: error_code(0x0000) - not-present page
PGD 0 P4D 0
Oops: 0000 [#1] SMP PTI
CPU: 33 PID: 16573 Comm: kworker/u97:799 Not tainted 6.8.7-cm4all1-hp+ #43
Hardware name: HP ProLiant DL380 Gen9/ProLiant DL380 Gen9, BIOS P89 10/17/2018
Workqueue: events_unbound netfs_rreq_write_to_cache_work
RIP: 0010:cachefiles_prepare_write+0x30/0xa0
Code: 57 41 56 45 89 ce 41 55 49 89 cd 41 54 49 89 d4 55 53 48 89 fb 48 83 ec 08 48 8b 47 08 48 83 7f 10 00 48 89 34 24 48 8b 68 20 <48> 8b 45 08 4c 8b 38 74 45 49 8b 7f 50 e8 4e a9 b0 ff 48 8b 73 10
RSP: 0018:ffffb4e78113bde0 EFLAGS: 00010286
RAX: ffff976126be6d10 RBX: ffff97615cdb8438 RCX: 0000000000020000
RDX: ffff97605e6c4c68 RSI: ffff97605e6c4c60 RDI: ffff97615cdb8438
RBP: 0000000000000000 R08: 0000000000278333 R09: 0000000000000001
R10: ffff97605e6c4600 R11: 0000000000000001 R12: ffff97605e6c4c68
R13: 0000000000020000 R14: 0000000000000001 R15: ffff976064fe2c00
FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff9776dfd40000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
CR2: 0000000000000008 CR3: 000000005942c002 CR4: 00000000001706f0
Call Trace:
<TASK>
? __die+0x1f/0x70
? page_fault_oops+0x15d/0x440
? search_module_extables+0xe/0x40
? fixup_exception+0x22/0x2f0
? exc_page_fault+0x5f/0x100
? asm_exc_page_fault+0x22/0x30
? cachefiles_prepare_write+0x30/0xa0
netfs_rreq_write_to_cache_work+0x135/0x2e0
process_one_work+0x137/0x2c0
worker_thread+0x2e9/0x400
? __pfx_worker_thread+0x10/0x10
kthread+0xcc/0x100
? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10
ret_from_fork+0x30/0x50
? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10
ret_from_fork_asm+0x1b/0x30
</TASK>
Modules linked in:
CR2: 0000000000000008
---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]---
This happened because fscache_cookie_state_machine() was slow and was
still running while another process invoked fscache_unuse_cookie();
this led to a fscache_cookie_lru_do_one() call, setting the
FSCACHE_COOKIE_DO_LRU_DISCARD flag, which was picked up by
fscache_cookie_state_machine(), withdrawing the cookie via
cachefiles_withdraw_cookie(), clearing cookie->cache_priv.
At the same time, yet another process invoked
cachefiles_prepare_write(), which found a NULL pointer in this code
line:
struct cachefiles_object *object = cachefiles_cres_object(cres);
The next line crashes, obviously:
struct cachefiles_cache *cache = object->volume->cache;
During cachefiles_prepare_write(), the "n_accesses" counter is
non-zero (via fscache_begin_operation()). The cookie must not be
withdrawn until it drops to zero.
The counter is checked by fscache_cookie_state_machine() before
switching to FSCACHE_COOKIE_STATE_RELINQUISHING and
FSCACHE_COOKIE_STATE_WITHDRAWING (in "case
FSCACHE_COOKIE_STATE_FAILED"), but not for
FSCACHE_COOKIE_STATE_LRU_DISCARDING ("case
FSCACHE_COOKIE_STATE_ACTIVE").
This patch adds the missing check. With a non-zero access counter,
the function returns and the next fscache_end_cookie_access() call
will queue another fscache_cookie_state_machine() call to handle the
still-pending FSCACHE_COOKIE_DO_LRU_DISCARD.
References
Impacted products
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| linux | linux_kernel | * | |
| linux | linux_kernel | * | |
| linux | linux_kernel | * | |
| linux | linux_kernel | 6.11 | |
| linux | linux_kernel | 6.11 | |
| linux | linux_kernel | 6.11 |
{
"configurations": [
{
"nodes": [
{
"cpeMatch": [
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "E1FCBB3B-3EA3-4D99-B4C1-E8EA9F3DA097",
"versionEndExcluding": "6.1.107",
"versionStartIncluding": "5.17",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "9DE9201A-CE6B-4726-BABB-8265EA0F8AE4",
"versionEndExcluding": "6.6.48",
"versionStartIncluding": "6.2",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "D2AFDFD1-D95A-4EB7-843B-5E7659518B67",
"versionEndExcluding": "6.10.7",
"versionStartIncluding": "6.7",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:6.11:rc1:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "8B3CE743-2126-47A3-8B7C-822B502CF119",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:6.11:rc2:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "4DEB27E7-30AA-45CC-8934-B89263EF3551",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:6.11:rc3:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "E0005AEF-856E-47EB-BFE4-90C46899394D",
"vulnerable": true
}
],
"negate": false,
"operator": "OR"
}
]
}
],
"cveTags": [],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nfs/netfs/fscache_cookie: add missing \"n_accesses\" check\n\nThis fixes a NULL pointer dereference bug due to a data race which\nlooks like this:\n\n BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 0000000000000008\n #PF: supervisor read access in kernel mode\n #PF: error_code(0x0000) - not-present page\n PGD 0 P4D 0\n Oops: 0000 [#1] SMP PTI\n CPU: 33 PID: 16573 Comm: kworker/u97:799 Not tainted 6.8.7-cm4all1-hp+ #43\n Hardware name: HP ProLiant DL380 Gen9/ProLiant DL380 Gen9, BIOS P89 10/17/2018\n Workqueue: events_unbound netfs_rreq_write_to_cache_work\n RIP: 0010:cachefiles_prepare_write+0x30/0xa0\n Code: 57 41 56 45 89 ce 41 55 49 89 cd 41 54 49 89 d4 55 53 48 89 fb 48 83 ec 08 48 8b 47 08 48 83 7f 10 00 48 89 34 24 48 8b 68 20 \u003c48\u003e 8b 45 08 4c 8b 38 74 45 49 8b 7f 50 e8 4e a9 b0 ff 48 8b 73 10\n RSP: 0018:ffffb4e78113bde0 EFLAGS: 00010286\n RAX: ffff976126be6d10 RBX: ffff97615cdb8438 RCX: 0000000000020000\n RDX: ffff97605e6c4c68 RSI: ffff97605e6c4c60 RDI: ffff97615cdb8438\n RBP: 0000000000000000 R08: 0000000000278333 R09: 0000000000000001\n R10: ffff97605e6c4600 R11: 0000000000000001 R12: ffff97605e6c4c68\n R13: 0000000000020000 R14: 0000000000000001 R15: ffff976064fe2c00\n FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff9776dfd40000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000\n CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033\n CR2: 0000000000000008 CR3: 000000005942c002 CR4: 00000000001706f0\n Call Trace:\n \u003cTASK\u003e\n ? __die+0x1f/0x70\n ? page_fault_oops+0x15d/0x440\n ? search_module_extables+0xe/0x40\n ? fixup_exception+0x22/0x2f0\n ? exc_page_fault+0x5f/0x100\n ? asm_exc_page_fault+0x22/0x30\n ? cachefiles_prepare_write+0x30/0xa0\n netfs_rreq_write_to_cache_work+0x135/0x2e0\n process_one_work+0x137/0x2c0\n worker_thread+0x2e9/0x400\n ? __pfx_worker_thread+0x10/0x10\n kthread+0xcc/0x100\n ? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10\n ret_from_fork+0x30/0x50\n ? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10\n ret_from_fork_asm+0x1b/0x30\n \u003c/TASK\u003e\n Modules linked in:\n CR2: 0000000000000008\n ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]---\n\nThis happened because fscache_cookie_state_machine() was slow and was\nstill running while another process invoked fscache_unuse_cookie();\nthis led to a fscache_cookie_lru_do_one() call, setting the\nFSCACHE_COOKIE_DO_LRU_DISCARD flag, which was picked up by\nfscache_cookie_state_machine(), withdrawing the cookie via\ncachefiles_withdraw_cookie(), clearing cookie-\u003ecache_priv.\n\nAt the same time, yet another process invoked\ncachefiles_prepare_write(), which found a NULL pointer in this code\nline:\n\n struct cachefiles_object *object = cachefiles_cres_object(cres);\n\nThe next line crashes, obviously:\n\n struct cachefiles_cache *cache = object-\u003evolume-\u003ecache;\n\nDuring cachefiles_prepare_write(), the \"n_accesses\" counter is\nnon-zero (via fscache_begin_operation()). The cookie must not be\nwithdrawn until it drops to zero.\n\nThe counter is checked by fscache_cookie_state_machine() before\nswitching to FSCACHE_COOKIE_STATE_RELINQUISHING and\nFSCACHE_COOKIE_STATE_WITHDRAWING (in \"case\nFSCACHE_COOKIE_STATE_FAILED\"), but not for\nFSCACHE_COOKIE_STATE_LRU_DISCARDING (\"case\nFSCACHE_COOKIE_STATE_ACTIVE\").\n\nThis patch adds the missing check. With a non-zero access counter,\nthe function returns and the next fscache_end_cookie_access() call\nwill queue another fscache_cookie_state_machine() call to handle the\nstill-pending FSCACHE_COOKIE_DO_LRU_DISCARD."
},
{
"lang": "es",
"value": "En el kernel de Linux, se ha resuelto la siguiente vulnerabilidad: fs/netfs/fscache_cookie: agregar comprobaci\u00f3n \"n_accesses\" faltante Esto corrige un error de desreferencia de puntero NULL debido a una ejecuci\u00f3n de datos que se ve as\u00ed: ERROR: desreferencia de puntero NULL del kernel, direcci\u00f3n: 0000000000000008 #PF: acceso de lectura de supervisor en modo kernel #PF: error_code(0x0000) - p\u00e1gina no presente PGD 0 P4D 0 Oops: 0000 [#1] SMP PTI CPU: 33 PID: 16573 Comm: kworker/u97:799 No contaminado 6.8.7-cm4all1-hp+ #43 Nombre del hardware: HP ProLiant DL380 Gen9/ProLiant DL380 Gen9, BIOS P89 17/10/2018 Cola de trabajo: events_unbound netfs_rreq_write_to_cache_work RIP: 0010:cachefiles_prepare_write+0x30/0xa0 C\u00f3digo: 57 41 56 45 89 ce 41 55 49 89 cd 41 54 49 89 d4 55 53 48 89 fb 48 83 ec 08 48 8b 47 08 48 83 7f 10 00 48 89 34 24 48 8b 68 20 \u0026lt;48\u0026gt; 8b 45 08 4c 8b 38 74 45 49 8b 7f 50 e8 4e a9 b0 ff 48 8b 73 10 RSP: 0018:ffffb4e78113bde0 EFLAGS: 00010286 RAX: ffff976126be6d10 RBX: ffff97615cdb8438 RCX: 0000000000020000 RDX: ffff97605e6c4c68 RSI: ffff97605e6c4c60 RDI: ffff97615cdb8438 RBP: 000000000000000 R08: 0000000000278333 R09: 0000000000000001 R10: ffff97605e6c4600 R11: 0000000000000001 R12: ffff97605e6c4c68 R13: 0000000000020000 R14: 0000000000000001 R15: ffff976064fe2c00 FS: 000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff9776dfd40000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: 000000000000008 CR3: 000000005942c002 CR4: 00000000001706f0 Seguimiento de llamadas: ? __die+0x1f/0x70 ? page_fault_oops+0x15d/0x440 ? search_module_extables+0xe/0x40 ? fixup_exception+0x22/0x2f0 ? exc_page_fault+0x5f/0x100 ? asm_exc_page_fault+0x22/0x30 ? cachefiles_prepare_write+0x30/0xa0 netfs_rreq_write_to_cache_work+0x135/0x2e0 process_one_work+0x137/0x2c0 subproceso_trabajador+0x2e9/0x400 ? __pfx_worker_thread+0x10/0x10 kthread+0xcc/0x100 ? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10 ret_from_fork+0x30/0x50 ? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10 ret_from_fork_asm+0x1b/0x30 M\u00f3dulos vinculados en: CR2: 000000000000008 ---[ fin del seguimiento 000000000000000 ]--- Esto sucedi\u00f3 porque fscache_cookie_state_machine() era lento y todav\u00eda se estaba ejecutando mientras otro proceso invocaba fscache_unuse_cookie(); Esto llev\u00f3 a una llamada a fscache_cookie_lru_do_one(), que estableci\u00f3 el indicador FSCACHE_COOKIE_DO_LRU_DISCARD, que fue detectado por fscache_cookie_state_machine(), retirando la cookie a trav\u00e9s de cachefiles_withdraw_cookie(), borrando cookie-\u0026gt;cache_priv. Al mismo tiempo, otro proceso invoc\u00f3 cachefiles_prepare_write(), que encontr\u00f3 un puntero NULL en esta l\u00ednea de c\u00f3digo: struct cachefiles_object *object = cachefiles_cres_object(cres); La siguiente l\u00ednea falla, obviamente: struct cachefiles_cache *cache = object-\u0026gt;volume-\u0026gt;cache; Durante cachefiles_prepare_write(), el contador \"n_accesses\" no es cero (a trav\u00e9s de fscache_begin_operation()). La cookie no debe retirarse hasta que baje a cero. El contador se comprueba mediante fscache_cookie_state_machine() antes de cambiar a FSCACHE_COOKIE_STATE_RELINQUISHING y FSCACHE_COOKIE_STATE_WITHDRAWING (en el \"caso FSCACHE_COOKIE_STATE_FAILED\"), pero no para FSCACHE_COOKIE_STATE_LRU_DISCARDING (\"caso FSCACHE_COOKIE_STATE_ACTIVE\"). Este parche agrega la comprobaci\u00f3n faltante. Con un contador de acceso distinto de cero, la funci\u00f3n retorna y la siguiente llamada fscache_end_cookie_access() pondr\u00e1 en cola otra llamada fscache_cookie_state_machine() para manejar la FSCACHE_COOKIE_DO_LRU_DISCARD a\u00fan pendiente."
}
],
"id": "CVE-2024-45000",
"lastModified": "2025-11-03T23:15:48.120",
"metrics": {
"cvssMetricV31": [
{
"cvssData": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "LOCAL",
"availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"baseScore": 5.5,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"integrityImpact": "NONE",
"privilegesRequired": "LOW",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
"version": "3.1"
},
"exploitabilityScore": 1.8,
"impactScore": 3.6,
"source": "nvd@nist.gov",
"type": "Primary"
}
]
},
"published": "2024-09-04T20:15:08.657",
"references": [
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/0a4d41fa14b2a0efd40e350cfe8ec6a4c998ac1d"
},
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/b8a50877f68efdcc0be3fcc5116e00c31b90e45b"
},
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/dfaa39b05a6cf34a16c525a2759ee6ab26b5fef6"
},
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/f71aa06398aabc2e3eaac25acdf3d62e0094ba70"
},
{
"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"url": "https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2025/01/msg00001.html"
}
],
"sourceIdentifier": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"vulnStatus": "Modified",
"weaknesses": [
{
"description": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CWE-476"
}
],
"source": "nvd@nist.gov",
"type": "Primary"
}
]
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…