GHSA-45RJ-9F26-3GF5
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2024-05-19 12:30 – Updated: 2025-11-04 00:30
VLAI?
Details
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
wifi: cfg80211: check A-MSDU format more carefully
If it looks like there's another subframe in the A-MSDU but the header isn't fully there, we can end up reading data out of bounds, only to discard later. Make this a bit more careful and check if the subframe header can even be present.
Severity ?
7.1 (High)
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2024-35937"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-125"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2024-05-19T11:15:49Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nwifi: cfg80211: check A-MSDU format more carefully\n\nIf it looks like there\u0027s another subframe in the A-MSDU\nbut the header isn\u0027t fully there, we can end up reading\ndata out of bounds, only to discard later. Make this a\nbit more careful and check if the subframe header can\neven be present.",
"id": "GHSA-45rj-9f26-3gf5",
"modified": "2025-11-04T00:30:48Z",
"published": "2024-05-19T12:30:39Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-35937"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/16da1e1dac23be45ef6e23c41b1508c400e6c544"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/5d7a8585fbb31e88fb2a0f581b70667d3300d1e9"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/9ad7974856926129f190ffbe3beea78460b3b7cc"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/9eb3bc0973d084423a6df21cf2c74692ff05647e"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2025/01/msg00001.html"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…