GHSA-989P-25JR-248M
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2024-04-02 09:30 – Updated: 2024-11-01 21:31
VLAI?
Details
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
drm/amd/display: Fix 'panel_cntl' could be null in 'dcn21_set_backlight_level()'
'panel_cntl' structure used to control the display panel could be null, dereferencing it could lead to a null pointer access.
Fixes the below: drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../display/dc/hwss/dcn21/dcn21_hwseq.c:269 dcn21_set_backlight_level() error: we previously assumed 'panel_cntl' could be null (see line 250)
Severity ?
5.5 (Medium)
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2024-26662"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-476"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2024-04-02T07:15:43Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\ndrm/amd/display: Fix \u0027panel_cntl\u0027 could be null in \u0027dcn21_set_backlight_level()\u0027\n\n\u0027panel_cntl\u0027 structure used to control the display panel could be null,\ndereferencing it could lead to a null pointer access.\n\nFixes the below:\ndrivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../display/dc/hwss/dcn21/dcn21_hwseq.c:269 dcn21_set_backlight_level() error: we previously assumed \u0027panel_cntl\u0027 could be null (see line 250)",
"id": "GHSA-989p-25jr-248m",
"modified": "2024-11-01T21:31:46Z",
"published": "2024-04-02T09:30:41Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-26662"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/0c863cab0e9173f8b6c7bc328bee3b8625f131b5"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/2e150ccea13129eb048679114808eb9770443e4d"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/e96fddb32931d007db12b1fce9b5e8e4c080401b"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…