GHSA-FF75-3HC4-J344

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2025-01-11 15:30 – Updated: 2025-01-31 18:31
VLAI?
Details

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

pinmux: Use sequential access to access desc->pinmux data

When two client of the same gpio call pinctrl_select_state() for the same functionality, we are seeing NULL pointer issue while accessing desc->mux_owner.

Let's say two processes A, B executing in pin_request() for the same pin and process A updates the desc->mux_usecount but not yet updated the desc->mux_owner while process B see the desc->mux_usecount which got updated by A path and further executes strcmp and while accessing desc->mux_owner it crashes with NULL pointer.

Serialize the access to mux related setting with a mutex lock.

cpu0 (process A)            cpu1(process B)

pinctrl_select_state() { pinctrl_select_state() { pin_request() { pin_request() { ... .... } else { desc->mux_usecount++; desc->mux_usecount && strcmp(desc->mux_owner, owner)) {

     if (desc->mux_usecount > 1)
           return 0;
     desc->mux_owner = owner;

} }

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2024-47141"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-667"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2025-01-11T13:15:21Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\npinmux: Use sequential access to access desc-\u003epinmux data\n\nWhen two client of the same gpio call pinctrl_select_state() for the\nsame functionality, we are seeing NULL pointer issue while accessing\ndesc-\u003emux_owner.\n\nLet\u0027s say two processes A, B executing in pin_request() for the same pin\nand process A updates the desc-\u003emux_usecount but not yet updated the\ndesc-\u003emux_owner while process B see the desc-\u003emux_usecount which got\nupdated by A path and further executes strcmp and while accessing\ndesc-\u003emux_owner it crashes with NULL pointer.\n\nSerialize the access to mux related setting with a mutex lock.\n\n\tcpu0 (process A)\t\t\tcpu1(process B)\n\npinctrl_select_state() {\t\t  pinctrl_select_state() {\n  pin_request() {\t\t\t\tpin_request() {\n  ...\n\t\t\t\t\t\t ....\n    } else {\n         desc-\u003emux_usecount++;\n    \t\t\t\t\t\tdesc-\u003emux_usecount \u0026\u0026 strcmp(desc-\u003emux_owner, owner)) {\n\n         if (desc-\u003emux_usecount \u003e 1)\n               return 0;\n         desc-\u003emux_owner = owner;\n\n  }\t\t\t\t\t\t}",
  "id": "GHSA-ff75-3hc4-j344",
  "modified": "2025-01-31T18:31:04Z",
  "published": "2025-01-11T15:30:27Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-47141"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/2da32aed4a97ca1d70fb8b77926f72f30ce5fb4b"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/5a3e85c3c397c781393ea5fb2f45b1f60f8a4e6e"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/c11e2ec9a780f54982a187ee10ffd1b810715c85"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.


Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…