GHSA-FRRF-PWHQ-W5PW

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2024-08-17 12:30 – Updated: 2025-11-04 00:31
VLAI?
Details

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

wifi: rtw89: Fix array index mistake in rtw89_sta_info_get_iter()

In rtw89_sta_info_get_iter() 'status->he_gi' is compared to array size. But then 'rate->he_gi' is used as array index instead of 'status->he_gi'. This can lead to go beyond array boundaries in case of 'rate->he_gi' is not equal to 'status->he_gi' and is bigger than array size. Looks like "copy-paste" mistake.

Fix this mistake by replacing 'rate->he_gi' with 'status->he_gi'.

Found by Linux Verification Center (linuxtesting.org) with SVACE.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2024-43842"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-129"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2024-08-17T10:15:09Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nwifi: rtw89: Fix array index mistake in rtw89_sta_info_get_iter()\n\nIn rtw89_sta_info_get_iter() \u0027status-\u003ehe_gi\u0027 is compared to array size.\nBut then \u0027rate-\u003ehe_gi\u0027 is used as array index instead of \u0027status-\u003ehe_gi\u0027.\nThis can lead to go beyond array boundaries in case of \u0027rate-\u003ehe_gi\u0027 is\nnot equal to \u0027status-\u003ehe_gi\u0027 and is bigger than array size. Looks like\n\"copy-paste\" mistake.\n\nFix this mistake by replacing \u0027rate-\u003ehe_gi\u0027 with \u0027status-\u003ehe_gi\u0027.\n\nFound by Linux Verification Center (linuxtesting.org) with SVACE.",
  "id": "GHSA-frrf-pwhq-w5pw",
  "modified": "2025-11-04T00:31:16Z",
  "published": "2024-08-17T12:30:32Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-43842"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/7a0edc3d83aff3a48813d78c9cad9daf38decc74"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/85099c7ce4f9e64c66aa397cd9a37473637ab891"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/96ae4de5bc4c8ba39fd072369398f59495b73f58"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/a2a095c08b95372d6d0c5819b77f071af5e75366"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2025/01/msg00001.html"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.


Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…