GHSA-M93M-C433-Q3H9
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2024-07-30 09:32 – Updated: 2025-10-06 18:31
VLAI?
Details
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
wifi: rtw89: fw: scan offload prohibit all 6 GHz channel if no 6 GHz sband
We have some policy via BIOS to block uses of 6 GHz. In this case, 6 GHz sband will be NULL even if it is WiFi 7 chip. So, add NULL handling here to avoid crash.
Severity ?
5.5 (Medium)
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2024-42125"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-476"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2024-07-30T08:15:04Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nwifi: rtw89: fw: scan offload prohibit all 6 GHz channel if no 6 GHz sband\n\nWe have some policy via BIOS to block uses of 6 GHz. In this case, 6 GHz\nsband will be NULL even if it is WiFi 7 chip. So, add NULL handling here\nto avoid crash.",
"id": "GHSA-m93m-c433-q3h9",
"modified": "2025-10-06T18:31:01Z",
"published": "2024-07-30T09:32:01Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-42125"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/bb38626f3f97e16e6d368a9ff6daf320f3fe31d9"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/ce4ba62f8bc5195a9a0d49c6235a9c99e619cadc"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…