GHSA-PRCQ-9P67-4W6H
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2024-04-28 12:30 – Updated: 2024-07-03 18:37
VLAI?
Details
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
ASoC: SOF: Add some bounds checking to firmware data
Smatch complains about "head->full_size - head->header_size" can underflow. To some extent, we're always going to have to trust the firmware a bit. However, it's easy enough to add a check for negatives, and let's add a upper bounds check as well.
Severity ?
8.4 (High)
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2024-26927"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-120"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2024-04-28T12:15:21Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nASoC: SOF: Add some bounds checking to firmware data\n\nSmatch complains about \"head-\u003efull_size - head-\u003eheader_size\" can\nunderflow. To some extent, we\u0027re always going to have to trust the\nfirmware a bit. However, it\u0027s easy enough to add a check for negatives,\nand let\u0027s add a upper bounds check as well.",
"id": "GHSA-prcq-9p67-4w6h",
"modified": "2024-07-03T18:37:10Z",
"published": "2024-04-28T12:30:28Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-26927"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/044e220667157fb9d59320341badec59cf45ba48"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/98f681b0f84cfc3a1d83287b77697679e0398306"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/9eeb8e1231f6450c574c1db979122e171a1813ab"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/ced7df8b3c5c4751244cad79011e86cf1f809153"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/d133d67e7e724102d1e53009c4f88afaaf3e167c"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…