mal-2026-866
Vulnerability from ossf_malicious_packages
Published
2026-02-12 08:03
Modified
2026-02-19 22:47
Summary
Malicious code in oraceldb (PyPI)
Details
-= Per source details. Do not edit below this line.=-
Source: kam193 (723248915f1acb6de7c5bed00d0d554ced6b8cd6359d79436c8ab02f49f18360)
Package is a typosquatting or dependency confusion attempt with a low-harm local-only action, like leaving a flag file.
Category: PROBABLY_PENTEST - Packages looking like typical pentest packages, but also anything that looks like testing, exploring pre-prepared kits, research & co, with clearly low-harm possibilities.
Campaign: GENERIC-local-typosquatting
Reasons (based on the campaign):
-
dependency-confusion
-
The package overrides the install command in setup.py to execute malicious code during installation.
-
typosquatting
Source: ossf-package-analysis (65170c82304083d2a2f5af9240b263bb93ff24b2de05de41c1c05aac7879ee00)
The OpenSSF Package Analysis project identified 'oraceldb' @ 1.0.0 (pypi) as malicious.
It is considered malicious because:
- The package executes one or more commands associated with malicious behavior.
Credits
OpenSSF: Package Analysis
github.com/ossf/package-analysis
openssf.slack.com/channels/package_analysis
{
"affected": [
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "PyPI",
"name": "oraceldb"
},
"versions": [
"1.0.0"
]
}
],
"credits": [
{
"contact": [
"https://github.com/kam193",
"https://bad-packages.kam193.eu/"
],
"name": "Kamil Ma\u0144kowski (kam193)",
"type": "REPORTER"
},
{
"contact": [
"https://github.com/ossf/package-analysis",
"https://openssf.slack.com/channels/package_analysis"
],
"name": "OpenSSF: Package Analysis",
"type": "FINDER"
}
],
"database_specific": {
"malicious-packages-origins": [
{
"id": "pypi/GENERIC-local-typosquatting/oraceldb",
"import_time": "2026-02-12T09:22:04.908348292Z",
"modified_time": "2026-02-12T08:45:36.511717Z",
"sha256": "723248915f1acb6de7c5bed00d0d554ced6b8cd6359d79436c8ab02f49f18360",
"source": "kam193",
"versions": [
"1.0.0"
]
},
{
"import_time": "2026-02-19T22:45:34.729669383Z",
"modified_time": "2026-02-12T08:03:03Z",
"sha256": "65170c82304083d2a2f5af9240b263bb93ff24b2de05de41c1c05aac7879ee00",
"source": "ossf-package-analysis",
"versions": [
"1.0.0"
]
}
]
},
"details": "\n---\n_-= Per source details. Do not edit below this line.=-_\n\n## Source: kam193 (723248915f1acb6de7c5bed00d0d554ced6b8cd6359d79436c8ab02f49f18360)\nPackage is a typosquatting or dependency confusion attempt with a low-harm local-only action, like leaving a flag file.\n\n\n---\n\nCategory: PROBABLY_PENTEST - Packages looking like typical pentest packages, but also anything that looks like testing, exploring pre-prepared kits, research \u0026 co, with clearly low-harm possibilities.\n\n\nCampaign: GENERIC-local-typosquatting\n\n\nReasons (based on the campaign):\n\n\n - dependency-confusion\n\n\n - The package overrides the install command in setup.py to execute malicious code during installation.\n\n\n - typosquatting\n\n## Source: ossf-package-analysis (65170c82304083d2a2f5af9240b263bb93ff24b2de05de41c1c05aac7879ee00)\nThe OpenSSF Package Analysis project identified \u0027oraceldb\u0027 @ 1.0.0 (pypi) as malicious.\n\nIt is considered malicious because:\n\n- The package executes one or more commands associated with malicious behavior.\n",
"id": "MAL-2026-866",
"modified": "2026-02-19T22:47:48Z",
"published": "2026-02-12T08:03:03Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://bad-packages.kam193.eu/pypi/package/oraceldb"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.7.4",
"summary": "Malicious code in oraceldb (PyPI)"
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…