mal-2026-921
Vulnerability from ossf_malicious_packages
Published
2026-02-16 17:55
Modified
2026-02-19 22:47
Summary
Malicious code in cicibot-fix-message-naming (PyPI)
Details

-= Per source details. Do not edit below this line.=-

Source: kam193 (7fb20d1d9da8ede0270346034bb6fdca56ef578e35a73b4cb0301664ab4a27ab)

Importing the module starts a reverse shell


Category: MALICIOUS - The campaign has clearly malicious intent, like infostealers.

Campaign: 2026-02-cicibot-fix-message-naming

Reasons (based on the campaign):

  • The package contains code to create a reverse shell, allowing an attacker to execute any commands on the victim's machine.

Source: ossf-package-analysis (d90c985621252f6a8359b5fb8924d30a8541213ba43ddaac7c9215b7b22fe195)

The OpenSSF Package Analysis project identified 'cicibot-fix-message-naming' @ 0.0.1 (pypi) as malicious.

It is considered malicious because:

  • The package executes one or more commands associated with malicious behavior.

{
  "affected": [
    {
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "PyPI",
        "name": "cicibot-fix-message-naming"
      },
      "versions": [
        "0.0.1"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "credits": [
    {
      "contact": [
        "https://github.com/kam193",
        "https://bad-packages.kam193.eu/"
      ],
      "name": "Kamil Ma\u0144kowski (kam193)",
      "type": "ANALYST"
    },
    {
      "contact": [
        "https://github.com/ossf/package-analysis",
        "https://openssf.slack.com/channels/package_analysis"
      ],
      "name": "OpenSSF: Package Analysis",
      "type": "FINDER"
    }
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "iocs": {
      "ips": [
        "52.77.142.175"
      ]
    },
    "malicious-packages-origins": [
      {
        "id": "pypi/2026-02-cicibot-fix-message-naming/cicibot-fix-message-naming",
        "import_time": "2026-02-16T18:16:53.11403528Z",
        "modified_time": "2026-02-16T18:08:42.650749Z",
        "sha256": "7fb20d1d9da8ede0270346034bb6fdca56ef578e35a73b4cb0301664ab4a27ab",
        "source": "kam193",
        "versions": [
          "0.0.1"
        ]
      },
      {
        "import_time": "2026-02-19T22:45:35.442955724Z",
        "modified_time": "2026-02-16T17:55:41Z",
        "sha256": "d90c985621252f6a8359b5fb8924d30a8541213ba43ddaac7c9215b7b22fe195",
        "source": "ossf-package-analysis",
        "versions": [
          "0.0.1"
        ]
      }
    ]
  },
  "details": "\n---\n_-= Per source details. Do not edit below this line.=-_\n\n## Source: kam193 (7fb20d1d9da8ede0270346034bb6fdca56ef578e35a73b4cb0301664ab4a27ab)\nImporting the module starts a reverse shell\n\n\n---\n\nCategory: MALICIOUS - The campaign has clearly malicious intent, like infostealers.\n\n\nCampaign: 2026-02-cicibot-fix-message-naming\n\n\nReasons (based on the campaign):\n\n\n - The package contains code to create a reverse shell, allowing an attacker to execute any commands on the victim\u0027s machine.\n\n## Source: ossf-package-analysis (d90c985621252f6a8359b5fb8924d30a8541213ba43ddaac7c9215b7b22fe195)\nThe OpenSSF Package Analysis project identified \u0027cicibot-fix-message-naming\u0027 @ 0.0.1 (pypi) as malicious.\n\nIt is considered malicious because:\n\n- The package executes one or more commands associated with malicious behavior.\n",
  "id": "MAL-2026-921",
  "modified": "2026-02-19T22:47:48Z",
  "published": "2026-02-16T17:55:41Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://bad-packages.kam193.eu/pypi/package/cicibot-fix-message-naming"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.7.4",
  "summary": "Malicious code in cicibot-fix-message-naming (PyPI)"
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.


Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…