rustsec-2026-0018
Vulnerability from osv_rustsec
Published
2026-02-24 12:00
Modified
2026-02-24 16:32
Summary
`rpc-check` was removed from crates.io for malicious code
Details

This is part of an ongoing campaign to attempt to typosquat crates in the polymarket-client-sdk ecosystem to exfiltrate user credentials.

The malicious crate had 6 versions published from 2026-02-20 onwards and had no evidence of actual usage. There were no crates depending on this crate on crates.io.

Thanks to Eren for finding and reporting this to the Rust security response working group, and to Emily Albini for co-ordinating with the crates.io team.

The crates.io team advises anyone developing with Polymarket to review dependencies carefully. We are investigating ways to mitigate this attacker who appears to be very motivated to steal Polymarket credentials.


{
  "affected": [
    {
      "database_specific": {
        "categories": [],
        "cvss": null,
        "informational": null
      },
      "ecosystem_specific": {
        "affected_functions": null,
        "affects": {
          "arch": [],
          "functions": [],
          "os": []
        }
      },
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "crates.io",
        "name": "rpc-check",
        "purl": "pkg:cargo/rpc-check"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "0.0.0-0"
            }
          ],
          "type": "SEMVER"
        }
      ],
      "versions": []
    }
  ],
  "aliases": [],
  "database_specific": {
    "license": "CC0-1.0"
  },
  "details": "This is part of an ongoing campaign to attempt to typosquat crates in the\n[`polymarket-client-sdk`](https://crates.io/crates/polymarket-client-sdk)\necosystem to exfiltrate user credentials.\n\nThe malicious crate had 6 versions published from 2026-02-20 onwards and had no\nevidence of actual usage. There were no crates depending on this crate on\ncrates.io.\n\nThanks to Eren for finding and reporting this to the Rust security response\nworking group, and to Emily Albini for co-ordinating with the crates.io team.\n\nThe crates.io team advises anyone developing with Polymarket to review\ndependencies carefully. We are investigating ways to mitigate this attacker who\nappears to be very motivated to steal Polymarket credentials.",
  "id": "RUSTSEC-2026-0018",
  "modified": "2026-02-24T16:32:13Z",
  "published": "2026-02-24T12:00:00Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "PACKAGE",
      "url": "https://crates.io/crates/rpc-check"
    },
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://rustsec.org/advisories/RUSTSEC-2026-0018.html"
    }
  ],
  "related": [],
  "severity": [],
  "summary": "`rpc-check` was removed from crates.io for malicious code"
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.


Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…